Jackson v. HUD
| Janey Williams, Latoya Idlebird, Dinah Clark, Daija Jackson, Amanda Williams, Shirley Andrews, Sharobin White, Lawanda Douglas and Misty Joseph |
| United States Department of Housing and Urban Development |
| 21-20317 |
| June 16, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 09/07/2021 for Appellants Shirley Andrews, Dinah Clark, Lawanda Douglas, Latoya Idlebird, Daija Jackson, Misty Joseph, Sharobin White, Amanda Williams and Janey Williams. [21-20317] (CMB) [Entered: 07/28/2021 03:54 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Transcript Due/Court Reporter Discount Date canceled [21-20317] (CMB) [Entered: 07/28/2021 03:50 PM] |
| NO COURT REPORTER ACKNOWLEDGMENT RECEIVED for Mr. Dion Rupa. Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Dion Rupa, Dt. Ct. Rprt. Time Begins: 07/07/2021. Transcript deadlines created - Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment deadline canceled. Transcript Due/Court Reporter Discount Date is 08/06/2021 for Dion Rupa [21-20317] (JMW) [Entered: 07/26/2021 08:18 AM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellants Ms. Shirley Andrews, Ms. Dinah Clark, Ms. Lawanda Douglas, Ms. Latoya Idlebird, Ms. Daija Jackson, Ms. Misty Joseph, Ms. Sharobin White, Ms. Amanda Williams and Ms. Janey Williams. DETAILS: Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Dion Rupa, Proceeding Type and Date: Motion Hearing 12/18/2019. Transcript Order ddl satisfied. Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment due on 07/19/2021 for Dion Rupa. Electronic Filing Processed: [ # 9613630-2 ] [21-20317] (ABT) [Entered: 07/08/2021 08:06 AM] |
| ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Appellants Ms. Shirley Andrews, Ms. Dinah Clark, Ms. Lawanda Douglas, Ms. Latoya Idlebird, Ms. Daija Jackson, Ms. Misty Joseph, Ms. Sharobin White, Ms. Amanda Williams and Ms. Janey Williamsfor the Court to process. Date of service: 07/07/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Beshara, Daniel, Myles, Rasic; Attorney for Appellees: Sandberg, Vela. [21-20317] (Kimberly Myles ) [Entered: 07/07/2021 03:05 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Velimir Rasic for party(s) Appellant Misty Joseph Appellant Daija Jackson Appellant Dinah Clark Appellant Lawanda Douglas Appellant Shirley Andrews Appellant Latoya Idlebird Appellant Sharobin White Appellant Janey Williams Appellant Amanda Williams, in case 21-20317 [21-20317] (ABT) [Entered: 06/28/2021 04:41 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Kimberly Myles for Appellant Misty Joseph in 21-20317, Attorney Kimberly Myles for Appellant Shirley Andrews in 21-20317, Attorney Kimberly Myles for Appellant Amanda Williams in 21-20317, Attorney Kimberly Myles for Appellant Lawanda Douglas in 21-20317, Attorney Kimberly Myles for Appellant Janey Williams in 21-20317, Attorney Kimberly Myles for Appellant Dinah Clark in 21-20317, Attorney Kimberly Myles for Appellant Latoya Idlebird in 21-20317, Attorney Kimberly Myles for Appellant Sharobin White in 21-20317, Attorney Kimberly Myles for Appellant Daija Jackson in 21-20317 [21-20317] (JMW) [Entered: 06/25/2021 04:02 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [21-20317] (Velimir Rasic ) [Entered: 06/25/2021 12:45 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Kimberly Myles for Ms. Shirley Andrews, Ms. Dinah Clark, Ms. Lawanda Douglas, Ms. Latoya Idlebird, Ms. Daija Jackson, Ms. Misty Joseph, Ms. Sharobin White, Ms. Amanda Williams and Ms. Janey Williams for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-20317] (Kimberly Myles ) [Entered: 06/24/2021 04:50 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-20317] (Jeffrey Eric Sandberg ) [Entered: 06/23/2021 03:42 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [21-20317] (Laura Beth Beshara ) [Entered: 06/23/2021 03:39 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [21-20317] (Michael Maury Daniel ) [Entered: 06/23/2021 05:09 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Michael Maury Daniel for party(s) Appellant Misty Joseph, Appellant Daija Jackson, Appellant Dinah Clark, Appellant Lawanda Douglas, Appellant Shirley Andrews, Appellant Latoya Idlebird, Appellant Sharobin White, Appellant Janey Williams, Appellant Amanda Williams, in case 21-20317. [21-20317] (SEP) [Entered: 06/24/2021 02:46 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Jeffrey Eric Sandberg for party(s) Appellee HUD, in case 21-20317. [21-20317] (SEP) [Entered: 06/24/2021 03:28 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Laura Beth Beshara for party(s) Appellant Misty Joseph, Appellant Daija Jackson, Appellant Dinah Clark, Appellant Lawanda Douglas, Appellant Shirley Andrews, Appellant Latoya Idlebird, Appellant Sharobin White, Appellant Janey Williams, Appellant Amanda Williams, in case 21-20317. [21-20317] (SEP) [Entered: 06/24/2021 03:11 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9602447-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 07/07/2021 for Appellants Shirley Andrews, Dinah Clark, Lawanda Douglas, Latoya Idlebird, Daija Jackson, Misty Joseph, Sharobin White, Amanda Williams and Janey Williams [21-20317] (DMS) [Entered: 06/22/2021 12:58 PM] |
| CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellants Ms. Shirley Andrews, Ms. Dinah Clark, Ms. Lawanda Douglas, Ms. Latoya Idlebird, Ms. Daija Jackson, Ms. Misty Joseph, Ms. Sharobin White, Ms. Amanda Williams and Ms. Janey Williams [21-20317] (CCR) [Entered: 06/16/2021 10:03 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
