U.S. Bank v. Lamell
Plaintiff / Appellee: PHH Mortgage Corporation, Individually as Successors in Interest to Ocwen Loan Servicing and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee for CSMC Mortgage-Backed Trust 2007-3
Defendant / Appellant: Josef M. Lamell, also known as Arpad Lamell, also known as J. M. Arpad Lamell
Case Number: 21-20326
Filed: June 23, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 7, 2022 U.S. Bank v. Lamell
June 2, 2022 U.S. Bank v. Lamell

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 9, 2021 CLERK ORDER granting Motion for leave for pro se to file electronically filed by Appellant Mr. Josef M. Lamell [ # 9636874-2 ]; granting Motion to extend time to file appellant's brief filed by Appellant Mr. Josef M. Lamell [ # 9636876-2 ] A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 10/05/2021 for Appellant Josef M. Lamell [21-20326] (RLL) [Entered: 08/09/2021 10:20 AM]
August 5, 2021 UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Josef M. Lamell for leave to file electronically as a pro se party [9636874-2]. [21-20326] (RLL) [Entered: 08/06/2021 11:01 AM]
August 5, 2021 UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Josef M. Lamell to extend time to file brief as appellant [9636876-2]. [21-20326] (RLL) [Entered: 08/06/2021 11:04 AM]
July 23, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Amelia Marquis for party(s) Appellee U.S. Bank National Association Appellee PHH Mortgage Corporation, in case 21-20326 [21-20326] (JMW) [Entered: 07/23/2021 12:44 PM]
July 23, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Christopher D. Kratovil for party(s) Appellee U.S. Bank National Association Appellee PHH Mortgage Corporation, in case 21-20326 [21-20326] (JMW) [Entered: 07/23/2021 12:49 PM]
July 22, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-20326] (Christopher D. Kratovil ) [Entered: 07/22/2021 05:04 PM]
July 22, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [21-20326] (Amelia Marquis ) [Entered: 07/22/2021 05:09 PM]
July 21, 2021 CLERK ORDER granting Motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Mark Douglas Cronenwett [ # 9621127-2 ] [21-20326] (SDH) [Entered: 07/21/2021 07:50 AM]
July 16, 2021 MOTION filed by Attorney Mr. Mark Douglas Cronenwett for Appellees PHH Mortgage Corporation and U.S. Bank National Association to withdraw as counsel [9621127-2]. Date of Service: 07/16/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Cronenwett; US mail - Appellant Lamell [21-20326] (Mark Douglas Cronenwett ) [Entered: 07/16/2021 03:36 PM]
July 14, 2021 Attorney Amelia Marquis is advised to submit a proper DKT-5A form for appearance of counsel. [21-20326] (LBM) [Entered: 07/14/2021 04:15 PM]
July 14, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [21-20326] (Amelia Marquis ) [Entered: 07/14/2021 09:10 AM]
July 14, 2021 Attorney Christopher D. Kratovil is advised to resubmit an appearance form. [21-20326] (CJM) [Entered: 07/14/2021 10:19 AM]
July 13, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-20326] (Christopher D. Kratovil ) [Entered: 07/13/2021 05:58 PM]
July 8, 2021 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Josef M. Lamell advising transcript unnecessary; no hearings [21-20326] (CCR) [Entered: 07/08/2021 12:09 PM]
July 7, 2021 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:19-CV-2402. Electronic ROA due on 07/22/2021. [21-20326] (DMS) [Entered: 07/07/2021 08:03 AM]
July 7, 2021 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-20326] (MRW) [Entered: 07/07/2021 03:42 PM]
July 7, 2021 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 08/16/2021 for Appellant Josef M. Lamell. [21-20326] (MRW) [Entered: 07/07/2021 03:43 PM]
June 25, 2021 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9605955-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [21-20326] (JMW) [Entered: 06/25/2021 03:11 PM]
June 23, 2021 PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Josef M. Lamell [21-20326] (ABT) [Entered: 06/23/2021 03:27 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: U.S. Bank v. Lamell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: PHH Mortgage Corporation, Individually as Successors in Interest to Ocwen Loan Servicing
Represented By: Mark Douglas Cronenwett
Represented By: Christopher D. Kratovil Esq.
Represented By: Amelia Marquis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee for CSMC Mortgage-Backed Trust 2007-3
Represented By: Mark Douglas Cronenwett
Represented By: Christopher D. Kratovil Esq.
Represented By: Amelia Marquis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: Josef M. Lamell, also known as Arpad Lamell, also known as J. M. Arpad Lamell
Represented By: Josef M. Lamell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?