Smith v. Heap
Plaintiff / Appellee: Constable Herschel Smith
Defendant / Appellant: Constable Ted Heap
Case Number: 21-20329
Filed: June 25, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 14, 2022 Summary Smith v. Heap

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 13, 2021 EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellant Mr. Ted Heap. Extension Granted A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 09/15/2021 for Appellant Ted Heap [21-20329] (MRW) [Entered: 08/13/2021 11:08 AM]
August 13, 2021 UNOPPOSED LEVEL 1 EXTENSION REQUESTED by Appellant Mr. Ted Heap for filing Appellant's Brief until 09/15/2021 [21-20329] (Norman Ray Giles ) [Entered: 08/13/2021 10:26 AM]
July 8, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney William S. Helfand for Appellant Ted Heap in 21-20329, by Attorney(s) Norman Ray Giles for party(s) Appellant Ted Heap, in case 21-20329 [21-20329] (ABT) [Entered: 07/08/2021 09:13 AM]
July 7, 2021 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-20329] (MRW) [Entered: 07/07/2021 04:26 PM]
July 7, 2021 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:20-CV-3572. Electronic ROA due on 07/22/2021. [21-20329] (CAG) [Entered: 07/07/2021 09:44 AM]
July 7, 2021 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 08/16/2021 for Appellant Ted Heap. [21-20329] (MRW) [Entered: 07/07/2021 04:29 PM]
July 6, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [21-20329] (Norman Ray Giles ) [Entered: 07/06/2021 05:53 PM]
July 6, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. William S. Helfand for Mr. Ted Heap for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-20329] (William S. Helfand ) [Entered: 07/06/2021 05:58 PM]
July 6, 2021 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Transcript Order ddl satisfied [21-20329] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Ted Heap advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Date of Service: 07/06/2021 via US mail - Attorney for Appellee: Gourrier; email - Attorney for Appellant: Helfand [21-20329] (William S. Helfand ) [Entered: 07/06/2021 06:33 PM]
June 30, 2021 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9609117-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 07/15/2021 for Appellant Ted Heap [21-20329] (JMW) [Entered: 06/30/2021 12:51 PM]
June 25, 2021 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Ted Heap [21-20329] (CAG) [Entered: 06/25/2021 11:55 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Smith v. Heap
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: Constable Herschel Smith
Represented By: Joseph M. Gourrier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: Constable Ted Heap
Represented By: William S. Helfand
Represented By: Norman Ray Giles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?