Harper v. City of Houston
| City of Houston and State of Texas |
| Darrell J. Harper |
| 21-20334 |
| June 28, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the objection received from Appellant Mr. Darrell J. Harper because any pleadings or correspondance from Mr. Harper other than proof of payment of sanctions will not be processed or acknowledged per our letter dated 5/22/18 in 07-20603. [21-20334] (SDH) [Entered: 08/11/2021 01:33 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER dismissing appeal pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 42 for failure to comply with the Court's notice of 06/30/2021 [21-20334] (SDH) [Entered: 08/04/2021 11:51 AM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the ojection to sanction notice received from Appellant Mr. Darrell J. Harper because any pleadings or correspondance from Mr. Harper other than proof of payment of Sanctions will not be processed or acknowledged per our letter dated 5/22/18 in 07-20603. [21-20334] (SDH) [Entered: 07/09/2021 02:15 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9609153-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Miscellaneous due on 07/30/2021 for Appellant Darrell J. Harper. Monitoring for unpaid sanctions. [21-20334] (SDH) [Entered: 06/30/2021 01:16 PM] |
| CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Darrell J. Harper [21-20334] (SDH) [Entered: 06/28/2021 04:01 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
