Prudential Insurance v. Barrera
| Prudential Insurance Company of America, Elvia Barrera and Linda Arriazola |
| 21-20497 |
| September 16, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellants Ms. Linda Arriazola and Ms. Elvia Barrera. Extension Granted to and including 11/29/2021. A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 11/29/2021 for Appellants Linda Arriazola and Elvia Barrera [21-20497] (DMS) [Entered: 11/02/2021 08:49 AM] |
| UNOPPOSED LEVEL 1 EXTENSION REQUESTED by Appellants Ms. Linda Arriazola and Ms. Elvia Barrera for filing Brief of Appellants until 11/29/2021 [21-20497] (Danny R. Scott Jr.) [Entered: 11/01/2021 09:52 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 11/08/2021 for Appellants Linda Arriazola and Elvia Barrera. [21-20497] (MAS) [Entered: 09/28/2021 09:33 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-20497] (MAS) [Entered: 09/28/2021 09:32 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9672603-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [21-20497] (DMS) [Entered: 09/24/2021 08:36 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:20-CV-1150. Electronic ROA due on 10/12/2021. [21-20497] (DMS) [Entered: 09/24/2021 08:39 AM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellants Ms. Linda Arriazola and Ms. Elvia Barrera [21-20497] (RLL) [Entered: 09/16/2021 10:06 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
