Searcy v. Drug Enforcement Agcy
Plaintiff / Appellant: Lisa Marie Searcy
Defendant / Appellee: Drug Enforcement Agency, Harris County Sheriff's Department, Department of Justice, Judge William Harmon and Judge Mike Fields
Case Number: 21-20540
Filed: October 4, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 22, 2021 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-20540] (CMB) [Entered: 11/22/2021 09:02 AM]
November 16, 2021 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 10/20/2021 denying IFP for Appellant Ms. Lisa Marie Searcy because appeal is not taken in good faith - fee assessed - BAUGH case. Fee due on 12/16/2021 for Appellant Lisa Marie Searcy [21-20540] (DLM) [Entered: 11/16/2021 11:03 AM]
November 16, 2021 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:21-CV-2069, 3:21-CV-153. Electronic ROA due on 12/01/2021. [21-20540] (DLM) [Entered: 11/16/2021 11:16 AM]
November 9, 2021 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken on the a Notice to Court Update advising that the initial partial filing fee of $77.60 has been paid, which appears to also assert that transcripts from other district court cases are necessary received from Appellant Ms. Lisa Marie Searcy because the appeal will not require transcripts. Any attempt to have the record supplemented with transcripts from any other case will require a motion specific to this relief, along with the prepared transcripts sought be supplemented in this appeal. Also included was the inquiry of whether her appellant's brief was received. A document that may be her brief was received. She should refer to the court's notice of 11/4/21 regarding the potential premature briefs. [21-20540] (DLM) [Entered: 11/16/2021 10:48 AM]
November 3, 2021 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the additional multiple sets of a "Petition Appeal" which appears to be a premature brief on the merits of the appeal received from Appellant Ms. Lisa Marie Searcy because until the filing fee is resolved, a merits brief is premature and cannot be filed (addressed in the notice issued on 11/4/21) [21-20540] (DLM) [Entered: 11/04/2021 09:56 AM]
October 25, 2021 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the "Petition Appeal" (Copy #3), a single paged "Petition Appeal" (marked as Copy #1 received in a separate mailing), another "Petition Appeal" marked as an original 6 page document, along with the remaining pages to the single page petition (for a total of 4 sets of the "Petition Appeal" document received from Appellant Ms. Lisa Marie Searcy. To the extent this is a brief on the merits, same is premature at this time and cannot be filed. [21-20540] (DLM) [Entered: 11/04/2021 09:42 AM]
October 12, 2021 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9685988-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 12/06/2021 for Appellant Lisa Marie Searcy [21-20540] (CAG) [Entered: 10/11/2021 12:25 PM]
October 4, 2021 PARTY LIMIT CASE. (FOR A FULL LIST OF PARTIES FOR THIS APPEAL, PLEASE REFER TO THE DISTRICT COURT'S DOCKET SHEET.) [21-20540] (CCR) [Entered: 10/04/2021 12:18 PM]
October 4, 2021 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Lisa Marie Searcy [21-20540] (CCR) [Entered: 10/04/2021 11:58 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Searcy v. Drug Enforcement Agcy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Lisa Marie Searcy
Represented By: Lisa Marie Searcy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Drug Enforcement Agency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Harris County Sheriff's Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Department of Justice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Judge William Harmon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Judge Mike Fields
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?