Nguyen v. Carroll
| Thy Ngoc Nguyen |
| Wallace L. Carroll, Field Office Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Houston, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General and United States Citizenship and Immigration Services |
| 21-20556 |
| October 19, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Peter D. Williamson for Appellant Thy Ngoc Nguyen in 21-20556 [21-20556] (RLL) [Entered: 12/17/2021 11:26 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Peter D. Williamson, Esq. for Mr. Thy Ngoc Nguyen for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-20556] (Peter D. Williamson ) [Entered: 12/15/2021 02:04 PM] |
| APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED. # of Copies Provided: 0. A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied. (PAPER COPY REQUIREMENT REMAINS SUSPENDED; PAPER COPIES WILL BE REQUESTED WHEN NEEDED) Appellee's Brief due on 01/14/2022 for Appellees Wallace L. Carroll, Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and United States Citizenship and Immigration Services [21-20556] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Mr. Thy Ngoc Nguyen. Date of service: 12/15/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Graulich, Robinson-Gaither; Attorney for Appellant: Williamson [21-20556] (Peter D. Williamson ) [Entered: 12/15/2021 02:33 PM] |
| RECORD EXCERPTS FILED. Record Excerpts NOT Sufficient as they require notice of appeal must be included; record citations are required for all documents in table of contents. Instructions to Attorney: PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED NOTICE FOR INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO REMEDY THE DEFAULT. # of Copies Provided: 0 Sufficient Record Excerpts due on 12/29/2021 for Appellee Wallace L. Carroll [21-20556] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPENDIX FILED by Appellant Mr. Thy Ngoc Nguyen Date of Service: 12/15/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Graulich, Robinson-Gaither; Attorney for Appellant: Williamson [21-20556] (Peter D. Williamson ) [Entered: 12/15/2021 03:04 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 12/15/2021 for Appellant Thy Ngoc Nguyen. [21-20556] (CMB) [Entered: 11/05/2021 12:30 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-20556] (CMB) [Entered: 11/05/2021 12:28 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:21-CV-2077. Electronic ROA due on 11/18/2021. [21-20556] (AGL) [Entered: 11/03/2021 03:15 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9704445-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [21-20556] (AGL) [Entered: 11/03/2021 03:11 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) James Cottrell Graulich III for party(s) Appellee Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General Appellee United States Citizenship and Immigration Services Appellee Wallace L. Carroll Appellee Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, in case 21-20556 [21-20556] (RLL) [Entered: 10/27/2021 12:20 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-20556] (James Cottrell Graulich III) [Entered: 10/26/2021 02:42 PM] |
| US CIVIL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Thy Ngoc Nguyen [21-20556] (RLL) [Entered: 10/19/2021 07:58 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
