Palma v. Abbott
| Michael Palma |
| Greg Abbott, State of Texas, Ken Paxton, Texas Attorney General, Harris County Appraisal District, Roland Altinger, Harris County Appraisal Review Board, Harris County Tax Assessor Collector, Ann Harris Bennett, Texas General Land Office, George P. Bush and Harris County Appraisal Review Board, Ronnie Thomas |
| 21-20588 |
| November 4, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| SUPPLEMENTAL ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-20588] (CMB) [Entered: 12/22/2021 07:25 AM] |
| Supplemental ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:21-CV-1210. Supplemental Electronic ROA due on 12/22/2021. [21-20588] (DMS) [Entered: 12/17/2021 09:40 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER granting appellant's Motion to supplement the record on appeal filed by Appellant Mr. Michael Palma [ # 9734438-2 ] [21-20588] (DMS) [Entered: 12/16/2021 12:17 PM] |
| EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellant Mr. Michael Palma. Extension Denied Reason: Requesting Beyond a Level 1 Extension (30 days) and for this a Motion is Required. [21-20588] (DMS) [Entered: 12/15/2021 09:57 AM] |
| LEVEL 1 EXTENSION REQUESTED by Appellant Mr. Michael Palma for filing Appellant brief - I do not know how long it will take to get the new ROA. until 02/28/2022 [21-20588] (Michael Palma ) [Entered: 12/14/2021 04:50 PM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Michael Palma to supplement the record on appeal with The original petition was not scanned in correctly by the SDT Houston Division [9734438-2]. Date of service: 12/14/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Coolidge, Viada; Appellant Palma [21-20588] (Michael Palma ) [Entered: 12/14/2021 04:46 PM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Party information modified for Harris County Appraisal Review Board in 21-20588. Update: added party text. [21-20588] (DMS) [Entered: 12/06/2021 02:05 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 01/18/2022 for Appellant Michael Palma. [21-20588] (DDL) [Entered: 12/06/2021 03:05 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-20588] (DDL) [Entered: 12/06/2021 03:05 PM] |
| REPLY filed by [9722430-1] to the Response/Opposition filed by Appellees Texas General Land Office, Mr. Ken Paxton and Mr. Greg Abbott in 21-20588 [ # 9721936-2 ]. Date of Service: 11/30/2021. [21-20588] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: REPLY filed by Appellant Mr. Michael Palma [9722430-1] to the Response/Opposition filed by Appellees Mr. Greg Abbott, Mr. Ken Paxton and Texas General Land Office [ # 9721936-2 ]. Date of Service: 11/30/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Coolidge, Viada; Appellant Palma. [21-20588] (Michael Palma ) [Entered: 11/30/2021 09:58 AM] |
| RESPONSE/OPPOSITION [9721936-1] to the Motion to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Mr. Michael Palma in 21-20588 [ # 9716707-2 ] Date of Service: 11/29/2021. [21-20588] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: RESPONSE/OPPOSITION filed by Mr. Greg Abbott, Mr. Ken Paxton and Texas General Land Office [9721936-1] to the Motion filed by Appellants Mr. Michael Palma and Mr. Michael Palma [ # 9716707-2 ] Date of Service: 11/29/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Coolidge, Viada; Appellant Palma. [21-20588] (John Daniel Coolidge ) [Entered: 11/29/2021 03:55 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:21-CV-1210. Electronic ROA due on 12/08/2021. [21-20588] (CAG) [Entered: 11/23/2021 08:42 AM] |
| AFFIDAVIT OF FINANCIAL STATUS filed by Appellant Mr. Michael Palma in support of the Motion to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Mr. Michael Palma in 21-20588 [ # 9716707-2 ].. [21-20588] (CAG) [Entered: 11/23/2021 08:40 AM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Michael Palma to proceed in forma pauperis [9716707-2] Fee deadline canceled. Date of service: 11/19/2021 [21-20588] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Michael Palma to proceed in forma pauperis [9716707-2]. Date of service: 11/19/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Coolidge, Viada; Appellant Palma [21-20588] (Michael Palma ) [Entered: 11/19/2021 12:21 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER granting Motion for leave for pro se to file electronically filed by Appellant Mr. Michael Palma [ # 9715499-2 ] [21-20588] (DMS) [Entered: 11/19/2021 08:53 AM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Michael Palma for leave to file electronically as a pro se party [9715499-2]. [21-20588] (DMS) [Entered: 11/18/2021 12:30 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney John Daniel Coolidge for Appellee Texas General Land Office in 21-20588, Attorney John Daniel Coolidge for Appellee Ken Paxton in 21-20588, Attorney John Daniel Coolidge for Appellee Greg Abbott in 21-20588 [21-20588] (ABT) [Entered: 11/16/2021 02:55 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. John Daniel Coolidge for Mr. Greg Abbott, Mr. Ken Paxton and Texas General Land Office for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-20588] (John Daniel Coolidge ) [Entered: 11/16/2021 12:17 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9712064-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 11/30/2021 for Appellant Michael Palma [21-20588] (DMS) [Entered: 11/15/2021 02:37 PM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Michael Palma [21-20588] (DMS) [Entered: 11/04/2021 08:08 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
