Cruise v. Lumpkin
| Robbie Duane Cruise |
| Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
| 21-20610 |
| November 22, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| LETTER REGARDING TRANSCRIPTS received from Appellant Mr. Robbie Duane Cruise advising that transcripts are unnecessary for appeal purposes. [21-20610] (DLM) [Entered: 01/05/2022 03:41 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No State Court Papers included? Yes. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-20610] (MRW) [Entered: 12/21/2021 04:28 PM] |
| LETTER ISSUED. Motion for COA and brief in support are required. Motion due on 01/31/2022 for Appellant Robbie Duane Cruise. Brief in Support due on 01/31/2022 for Appellant Robbie Duane Cruise [21-20610] (CAG) [Entered: 12/20/2021 01:37 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:21-CV-705. Electronic ROA due on 01/04/2022. [21-20610] (CAG) [Entered: 12/20/2021 01:38 PM] |
| FEE PAID by Appellant Mr. Robbie Duane Cruise. Fee deadline satisfied [21-20610] (CAG) [Entered: 12/20/2021 01:36 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER granting motion to extend time to pay filing fee filed by Appellant Mr. Robbie Duane Cruise [ # 9738099-2 ] Fee deadline updated to 01/11/2022 for Appellant Robbie Duane Cruise [21-20610] (DLM) [Entered: 12/20/2021 12:19 PM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Robbie Duane Cruise to extend time to pay filing fee [9738099-2]. Date of service: 12/11/2021 [21-20610] (DLM) [Entered: 12/20/2021 11:29 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Katherine Abell for Appellee Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division in 21-20610 [21-20610] (CCR) [Entered: 12/08/2021 11:01 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9726643-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Fee due on 12/21/2021 for Appellant Robbie Duane Cruise [21-20610] (CAG) [Entered: 12/06/2021 09:54 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Katherine Abell for Mr. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-20610] (Katherine Abell ) [Entered: 12/06/2021 03:04 PM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Robbie Duane Cruise [21-20610] (CAG) [Entered: 11/22/2021 02:25 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Cruise v. Lumpkin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: Robbie Duane Cruise | |
| Represented By: | Robbie Duane Cruise |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division | |
| Represented By: | Katherine Abell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
