Melvin JohnsonIn re: Melvin Johnson
| In re: Melvin Lynn Johnson, Jr. |
| 21-30217 |
| April 22, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION filed by Petitioner Mr. Melvin Lynn Johnson, Jr. to proceed in forma pauperis [9557282-2] Fee deadline canceled. Affidavit due on 05/24/2021 for Petitioner Melvin Lynn Johnson Jr.. [21-30217] (MRW) [Entered: 04/22/2021 03:18 PM] |
| PETITION filed by Petitioner Mr. Melvin Lynn Johnson, Jr. for writ of mandamus [9557270-2] Date received in 5th Circuit: 04/22/2021. Sufficient Mtn/Resp/Reply due on 05/24/2021 for Petitioner Melvin Lynn Johnson Jr.. Fee due on 05/24/2021 for Petitioner Melvin Lynn Johnson Jr.. Document is insufficient for the following reasons: dc judge not served [21-30217] (MRW) [Entered: 04/22/2021 03:10 PM] |
| ORIGINAL PROCEEDING CASE docketed. [21-30217] (MRW) [Entered: 04/22/2021 03:07 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Melvin JohnsonIn re: Melvin Johnson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: Melvin Lynn Johnson, Jr. | |
| Represented By: | Melvin Lynn Johnson Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
