Broussard v. USA
Plaintiff / Appellant: Nathaniel Broussard
Defendant / Appellee: United States of America
Case Number: 21-30376
Filed: July 2, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
October 25, 2022 Summary Broussard v. USA

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 27, 2021 RECORD EXCERPTS FILED by Appellant Mr. Nathaniel Broussard. Date of service: 08/27/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Hoffoss; Attorney for Appellee: King [21-30376] (John Lee Hoffoss Jr.) [Entered: 08/27/2021 03:03 PM]
August 27, 2021 APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Mr. Nathaniel Broussard. Date of service: 08/27/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Hoffoss; Attorney for Appellee: King [21-30376] (John Lee Hoffoss Jr.) [Entered: 08/27/2021 03:02 PM]
July 27, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Karen Julian King for Appellee USA in 21-30376 [21-30376] (MAS) [Entered: 07/27/2021 08:23 AM]
July 23, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Karen Julian King for USA for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-30376] (Karen Julian King ) [Entered: 07/23/2021 01:42 PM]
July 21, 2021 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 08/30/2021 for Appellant Nathaniel Broussard. [21-30376] (CMB) [Entered: 07/21/2021 10:24 AM]
July 21, 2021 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-30376] (CMB) [Entered: 07/21/2021 10:23 AM]
July 9, 2021 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 2:21-CV-355. Electronic ROA due on 07/26/2021. [21-30376] (SEP) [Entered: 07/09/2021 04:12 PM]
July 9, 2021 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9616017-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [21-30376] (SEP) [Entered: 07/09/2021 04:08 PM]
July 7, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney John Lee Hoffoss Jr. for Appellant Nathaniel Broussard in 21-30376 [21-30376] (MAS) [Entered: 07/07/2021 02:43 PM]
July 6, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-30376] (John Lee Hoffoss Jr.) [Entered: 07/06/2021 12:11 PM]
July 6, 2021 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. [21-30376] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Nathaniel Broussard advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Date of Service: 07/06/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Hoffoss; Attorney for Appellee: King [21-30376] (John Lee Hoffoss Jr.) [Entered: 07/06/2021 12:15 PM]
July 2, 2021 US CIVIL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Nathaniel Broussard. [21-30376] (DLJ) [Entered: 07/02/2021 03:28 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Broussard v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Nathaniel Broussard
Represented By: John Lee Hoffoss Esq. Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: United States of America
Represented By: Karen Julian King
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?