Thibodaux v. Reeves
| Darnay Thibodaux |
| Jon Reeves, District Administrator, Jefferson Parish District, Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Department of Probation and Parole and Lauren Skiles, Probation Officer |
| 21-30600 |
| September 29, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| UNOPPOSED LEVEL 1 EXTENSION REQUESTED by Appellant Ms. Darnay Thibodaux for filing Motion for Certificate of Appealability until 12/15/2021 [21-30600] (Claiborne Wood Brown ) [Entered: 11/15/2021 01:49 PM] |
| EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellant Ms. Darnay Thibodaux. Extension Granted to and including 12/15/2021. Motion due deadline updated to 12/15/2021 for Appellant Darnay Thibodaux. Brief in Support deadline updated to 12/15/2021 for Appellant Darnay Thibodaux [21-30600] (CB) [Entered: 11/15/2021 01:56 PM] |
| LETTER ISSUED. Motion for COA and brief in support are required. Motion due on 11/15/2021 for Appellant Darnay Thibodaux. Brief in Support due on 11/15/2021 for Appellant Darnay Thibodaux [21-30600] (MRW) [Entered: 10/06/2021 02:39 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No State Court Papers included? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-30600] (MRW) [Entered: 10/06/2021 02:38 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 2:19-CV-2241. Electronic ROA due on 10/21/2021. [21-30600] (SEP) [Entered: 10/06/2021 10:32 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete as to the notices of appeal filed in district court on 09/27/2021 and 10/04/2021. Action: Case OK to Process. [9682601-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [21-30600] (SEP) [Entered: 10/06/2021 10:29 AM] |
| FEE PAID by Appellant Ms. Darnay Thibodaux. [21-30600] (DLJ) [Entered: 10/05/2021 10:25 AM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [9681361-2] NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Darnay Thibodaux. [9681361-1] [21-30600] (DLJ) [Entered: 10/05/2021 10:37 AM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITH COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Darnay Thibodaux. [21-30600] (SEP) [Entered: 09/29/2021 10:32 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Thibodaux v. Reeves | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: Darnay Thibodaux | |
| Represented By: | Claiborne Wood Brown |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: Jon Reeves, District Administrator, Jefferson Parish District, Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Department of Probation and Parole | |
| Represented By: | Matthew B. Caplan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: Lauren Skiles, Probation Officer | |
| Represented By: | Matthew B. Caplan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
