Pigg v. B P X Operating Co
| Randy Pigg |
| B P X Operating Company, incorrectly named as B P X Energy, John M. Parsons, Department of Conservation Natural Resources Landman, Johnston H. Chandler, Department of Conservation Natural Resources Landman and Jeremy M. Evans, Clerk, 42nd Judicial District Court, DeSoto Parish |
| 21-30619 |
| October 5, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Randy Pigg to proceed in forma pauperis in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) [9717664-2] Fee deadline canceled. Affidavit due on 12/13/2021 for Appellant Randy Pigg. Date of service: 11/14/2021 Document is insufficient for the following reasons: Motion must include financial affidavit and prisoner trust account statement. [21-30619] (WMJ) [Entered: 11/22/2021 09:13 AM] |
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 11/02/2021 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Randy Pigg. Fee due on 12/06/2021 for Appellant Randy Pigg [21-30619] (WMJ) [Entered: 11/04/2021 02:34 PM] |
| LETTER filed by Appellant Mr. Randy Pigg clarifying intent of notice of appeal.. [21-30619] (WMJ) [Entered: 10/26/2021 10:53 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Review after Fee Issue is Resolved (PLRA case). [9686770-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 12/06/2021 for Appellant Randy Pigg [21-30619] (AGL) [Entered: 10/12/2021 12:01 PM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Randy Pigg [21-30619] (AGL) [Entered: 10/05/2021 11:56 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
