Meade v. Bonin
Hakeem Meade, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and Marshall Sookram |
Paul A. Bonin, Judge of the Orleans Parish Criminal District Court and ETOH Monitoring, L.L.C. |
21-30620 |
October 6, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Christian Wayne Helmke for party(s) Appellee ETOH Monitoring, L.L.C., in case 21-30620 [21-30620] (MRW) [Entered: 11/15/2021 01:03 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [21-30620] (Christian Wayne Helmke ) [Entered: 11/12/2021 04:26 PM] |
EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellants Mr. Hakeem Meade and Mr. Marshall Sookram. Extension Granted to and including 12/23/2021. A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 12/23/2021 for Appellants Hakeem Meade and Marshall Sookram [21-30620] (CB) [Entered: 11/08/2021 03:56 PM] |
UNOPPOSED LEVEL 1 EXTENSION REQUESTED by Appellants Mr. Hakeem Meade and Mr. Marshall Sookram for filing Appellants' Brief until 12/23/2021 [21-30620] (William R. Maurer ) [Entered: 11/08/2021 03:37 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Dane S. Ciolino for party(s) Appellee ETOH Monitoring, L.L.C., in case 21-30620 [21-30620] (MCS) [Entered: 11/02/2021 03:47 PM] |
TRANSCRIPT ORDER received advising No hearings transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. [21-30620] (MAS) [Entered: 11/01/2021 03:34 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-30620] (Dane S. Ciolino ) [Entered: 11/01/2021 04:14 PM] |
ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Appellants Mr. Hakeem Meade and Mr. Marshall Sookram (no hearings) for the Court to process. Date of service: 10/29/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Garner, Levenson; Attorney for Appellants: Maurer, Most, Tsitsuashvili. [21-30620] (William R. Maurer ) [Entered: 10/29/2021 05:34 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney William Brock Most for Appellant Marshall Sookram in 21-30620, Attorney William Brock Most for Appellant Hakeem Meade in 21-30620 [21-30620] (MCS) [Entered: 10/21/2021 11:54 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. William Brock Most for Mr. Hakeem Meade and Mr. Marshall Sookram for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [21-30620] (William Brock Most ) [Entered: 10/19/2021 01:52 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) William R. Maurer for party(s) Appellant Marshall Sookram Appellant Hakeem Meade, in case 21-30620 [21-30620] (CB) [Entered: 10/15/2021 11:43 AM] |
BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 11/23/2021 for Appellants Hakeem Meade and Marshall Sookram. [21-30620] (MRW) [Entered: 10/14/2021 09:20 AM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-30620] (MRW) [Entered: 10/14/2021 09:19 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Jaba Tsitsuashvili for party(s) Appellant Marshall Sookram Appellant Hakeem Meade, in case 21-30620 [21-30620] (CB) [Entered: 10/14/2021 01:51 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [21-30620] (Jaba Tsitsuashvili ) [Entered: 10/13/2021 01:44 PM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9688316-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [21-30620] (SEP) [Entered: 10/13/2021 02:51 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-30620] (William R. Maurer ) [Entered: 10/13/2021 04:00 PM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 2:20-CV-1455. Electronic ROA due on 10/28/2021. [21-30620] (SEP) [Entered: 10/13/2021 02:53 PM] |
CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellants Mr. Hakeem Meade and Mr. Marshall Sookram. [21-30620] (SEP) [Entered: 10/06/2021 09:41 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.