Tate v. United Steel
| James C. Tate |
| United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied International and Service Workers International Union Local 8363, More Properly Identified As |
| 21-30763 |
| December 21, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Mr. James C. Tate. Brief NOT Sufficient for the following reasons: contents are out of order; separate statement of facts is not allowed; missing standared of review and summary of argument; no record citations; not signed after the conclusion. Instructions to Attorney: PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED NOTICE FOR INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO REMEDY THE DEFAULT. # of Copies Provided: 0 A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied. Sufficient Brief due on 02/25/2022 for Appellant James C. Tate.. Record Excerpts due on 02/25/2022 for Appellant James C. Tate. Appellee's Brief due on 03/16/2022 for Appellee United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied International and Service Workers International Union Local 8363 [21-30763] (AGL) [Entered: 02/11/2022 04:15 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Sasha Shapiro for party(s) Appellee United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied International and Service Workers International Union Local 8363, in case 21-30763 [21-30763] (AGL) [Entered: 01/13/2022 08:29 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-30763] (Sasha Shapiro ) [Entered: 01/11/2022 03:11 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 02/15/2022 for Appellant James C. Tate. [21-30763] (MAS) [Entered: 01/06/2022 02:08 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-30763] (MAS) [Entered: 01/06/2022 02:05 PM] |
| FEE PAID by Appellant Mr. James C. Tate. Fee deadline satisfied [21-30763] (CB) [Entered: 01/05/2022 02:39 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 2:20-CV-882. Electronic ROA due on 01/20/2022. [21-30763] (CB) [Entered: 01/05/2022 02:40 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9745237-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Fee due on 01/14/2022 for Appellant James C. Tate. [21-30763] (SEP) [Entered: 12/30/2021 01:13 PM] |
| CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. James C. Tate. [21-30763] (SEP) [Entered: 12/21/2021 12:46 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Tate v. United Steel | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: James C. Tate | |
| Represented By: | James C. Tate |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied International and Service Workers International Union Local 8363, More Properly Identified As | |
| Represented By: | Julie M. Richard-Spencer Esq. |
| Represented By: | Sasha Shapiro Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
