Tolar v. Lumpkin
Justin Cain Tolar |
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
21-40026 |
January 11, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the 2/25/21 Letter "stating an issue in this case" of historical events in chronological order received from Appellant Mr. Justin Cain Tolar because it is not clear of the purpose of the letter. To the extent it is an attempt to supplement the request for COA already on file, it will be necessary to obtain leave of court to file. As a reminder, the signature pages as indicated in the clerk's notice of 2/10/21 remains due by 3/22/21. [21-40026] (DLM) [Entered: 03/11/2021 09:37 AM] |
CLERK ORDER granting motion to extend time to return an inmate trust fund statement and signature page for the brief in support of COA, and emergency motion for consideration filed by Appellant Mr. Justin Cain Tolar [ # 9515936-2 ]. Sufficient Motion,Response,Reply due deadline updated to 03/22/2021 for Appellant Justin Cain Tolar. [21-40026] (DLM) [Entered: 03/03/2021 10:48 AM] |
MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Justin Cain Tolar to extend the time to return a sufficient Motion for certificate of appealability (need signature pages) [ # 9501650-2 ] and provide a trust fund statement, until 03/22/2021 [9515936-2]. Date of service: 02/23/2021 [21-40026] (DLM) [Entered: 03/03/2021 10:25 AM] |
CLERK ORDER denying Motion for leave for pro se to file electronically filed by Appellant Mr. Justin Cain Tolar [ # 9504707-2 ] [21-40026] (MRW) [Entered: 02/17/2021 02:49 PM] |
MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Justin Cain Tolar for leave to file electronically as a pro se party [9504707-2]. [21-40026] (MRW) [Entered: 02/17/2021 08:34 AM] |
DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken on the Emergency Motion to Appeal to Amend Response to Magistrate Findings, directed to Judge Ron Clark, and Motion to Provide Documents, again directed to Judge Clark received from Appellant Mr. Justin Cain Tolar because they are viewed as service copies of filings intended for filing with the district court since they are not directed to this court. Directing his attention to the court's notices issued on 2/10/21 regarding signatures required and trust fund statement. [21-40026] (DLM) [Entered: 02/12/2021 12:39 PM] |
MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Justin Cain Tolar for certificate of appealability [9501650-2]. Document is insufficient for the following reasons: Needs a signature on both the moton and brief in support of COA. Motion due deadline satisfied. Sufficient Mtn/Resp/Reply due on 02/22/2021 for Appellant Justin Cain Tolar [21-40026] (DLM) [Entered: 02/10/2021 01:11 PM] |
SUFFICIENT BRIEF IN SUPPORT filed by Appellant Mr. Justin Cain Tolar in support of Motion for certificate of appealability [ # 9501650-2 ] Brief in Support deadline satisfied. Miscellaneous due on 02/22/2021 for Appellant Justin Cain Tolar. Document is insufficient for the following reason(s):Needs a signature. (advised in MOT 1 ntc.) [9501680-1] [21-40026] (DLM) [Entered: 02/10/2021 01:29 PM] |
MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Justin Cain Tolar Emergency Motion for Consideration. Document is insufficient for the following reasons: Needs a signature. (advised in MOT 1 ntc.). [9501697-2]. [21-40026] (DLM) [Entered: 02/10/2021 01:34 PM] |
MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Justin Cain Tolar to proceed in forma pauperis [9501619-2] Fee deadline canceled. Affidavit due on 02/22/2021 for Appellant Justin Cain Tolar. Date of service: 02/02/2021 Document is insufficient for the following reasons: Needs an inmate trust fund statement [21-40026] (DLM) [Entered: 02/10/2021 12:54 PM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No State Court Papers included? Yes. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-40026] (MRW) [Entered: 01/28/2021 02:58 PM] |
DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Motion for COA referring to the dismissal of previous mandamus received from Appellant Mr. Justin Cain Tolar because it does not contain an appellate case number, just the district court's case number. Because there's been several cases filed under the district court case number referenced, he'll need to provide the appropriate case number before any action will be taken. [21-40026] (DLM) [Entered: 01/29/2021 01:38 PM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9487267-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Motion due on 03/03/2021 for Appellant Justin Cain Tolar. Brief in Support due on 03/03/2021 for Appellant Justin Cain Tolar. Fee deadline updated to 03/03/2021 for Appellant Justin Cain Tolar [21-40026] (JMW) [Entered: 01/22/2021 08:59 AM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 9:17-CV-8. Electronic ROA due on 02/08/2021. [21-40026] (JMW) [Entered: 01/22/2021 09:11 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Casey Leigh Jackson Solomon for party(s) Appellee Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, in case 21-40026 [21-40026] (ABT) [Entered: 01/21/2021 09:31 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-40026] (Casey Leigh Jackson Solomon ) [Entered: 01/20/2021 12:23 PM] |
CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [9484989-2] NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Justin Cain Tolar. [9484989-1] [21-40026] (RLL) [Entered: 01/19/2021 03:24 PM] |
PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Justin Cain Tolar [21-40026] (CCR) [Entered: 01/11/2021 01:44 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.