USA v. Castillo-Chavez
Gerardo Castillo-Chavez, also known as Cachetes, also known as Armando Garcia |
United States of America |
21-40196 |
March 19, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
OPPOSED MOTION for certificate of appealability [9569844-2]. Motion due deadline satisfied. [21-40196] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: OPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Gerardo Castillo-Chavez for certificate of appealability [9569844-2]. Date of service: 05/10/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Lynch; Attorney for Appellee: Mitchell [21-40196] (Philip J. Lynch ) [Entered: 05/10/2021 12:53 AM] |
BRIEF IN SUPPORT in support of Motion for certificate of appealability [ # 9569844-2 ] Brief in Support deadline satisfied. [9569845-1] [21-40196] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: BRIEF IN SUPPORT filed by Appellant Mr. Gerardo Castillo-Chavez in support of Motion for certificate of appealability [ # 9569844-2 ]. Date of Service: 05/10/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Lynch; Attorney for Appellee: Mitchell. [9569845-1] [21-40196] (Philip J. Lynch ) [Entered: 05/10/2021 12:55 AM] |
LETTER ISSUED. Motion for COA and brief in support are required. Motion due on 05/10/2021 for Appellant Gerardo Castillo-Chavez. Brief in Support due on 05/10/2021 for Appellant Gerardo Castillo-Chavez [21-40196] (MRW) [Entered: 03/30/2021 11:51 AM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? Yes Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-40196] (MRW) [Entered: 03/30/2021 11:51 AM] |
CJA APPOINTMENT for Attorney Mr. Philip J. Lynch for Mr. Gerardo Castillo-Chavez. Counsel must use the eVoucher system to file the voucher at disposition of the case. Please see the attached document for further guidance. ORIGINATING COURT DISTRICT: STX ORIGINATING CASE NUMBER: 5:16-CV-173; 5:08-CR-244-24 DEFENDANT NUMBER: 24 DATE OF APPOINTMENT: 03/16/2021 [21-40196] (ABT) [Entered: 03/25/2021 07:09 AM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9534624-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [21-40196] (ABT) [Entered: 03/25/2021 07:04 AM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 5:16-CV-173; 5:08-CR-244-24. Electronic ROA due on 04/09/2021. [21-40196] (ABT) [Entered: 03/25/2021 07:08 AM] |
PRISONER CASE WITH COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Gerardo Castillo-Chavez [21-40196] (ABT) [Entered: 03/19/2021 04:24 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. Castillo-Chavez | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: Gerardo Castillo-Chavez, also known as Cachetes, also known as Armando Garcia | |
Represented By: | Philip J. Lynch |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Carmen Castillo Mitchell |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.