Collins v. Roop
| Caleb Oden and Ryan Roop |
| Charles Edward Collins |
| 21-40227 |
| March 29, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Robert Scott Davis for Appellant Caleb Oden in 21-40227, Attorney Robert Scott Davis for Appellant Ryan Roop in 21-40227 [21-40227] (DMS) [Entered: 04/07/2021 08:48 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER granting appellants' unopposed Motion to dismiss appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42 filed by Appellants Mr. Ryan Roop and Mr. Caleb Oden [ # 9542703-2 ] [21-40227] (DMS) [Entered: 04/07/2021 08:49 AM] |
| UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellants Mr. Caleb Oden and Mr. Ryan Roop to dismiss appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42 [9542703-2]. Date of service: 04/05/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Davis; US mail - Attorney for Appellee: Roth [21-40227] (Robert Scott Davis ) [Entered: 04/05/2021 02:43 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Robert Scott Davis, Esq. for Mr. Caleb Oden and Mr. Ryan Roop for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-40227] (Robert Scott Davis ) [Entered: 04/05/2021 02:27 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9541170-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 04/16/2021 for Appellants Caleb Oden and Ryan Roop [21-40227] (ABT) [Entered: 04/01/2021 03:23 PM] |
| CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellants Mr. Caleb Oden and Mr. Ryan Roop [21-40227] (ABT) [Entered: 03/29/2021 09:42 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
