USA v. Balagia
| James Morris Balagia, also known as DWI Dude |
| United States of America |
| 21-40366 |
| May 5, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9568364-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. (MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL PENDING IN DISTRICT COURT) [21-40366] (AGL) [Entered: 05/06/2021 12:51 PM] |
| DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant James Morris Balagia [21-40366] (SDH) [Entered: 05/05/2021 04:13 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Balagia | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: James Morris Balagia, also known as DWI Dude | |
| Represented By: | Gaylon Perry Riddels |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Heather Harris Rattan Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
