Choyce v. Lumpkin
| Argustus Charles Choyce |
| Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
| 21-40450 |
| June 11, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| DISTRICT COURT NOTICE - IFP pending for Appellant Mr. Argustus Charles Choyce. [21-40450] (JMW) [Entered: 07/23/2021 01:41 PM] |
| DISTRICT COURT NOTICE - IFP pending for Appellant Mr. Argustus Charles Choyce. Fee deadline satisfied. [21-40450] (DLM) [Entered: 07/02/2021 10:45 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Jessica Michelle Manojlovich for party(s) Appellee Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, in case 21-40450. [21-40450] (SEP) [Entered: 06/22/2021 02:23 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-40450] (Jessica Michelle Manojlovich ) [Entered: 06/21/2021 11:01 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9600532-2] [21-40450] (Additional Appeal) (JMW) [Entered: 06/21/2021 08:34 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9600521-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 07/06/2021 for Appellant Argustus Charles Choyce [21-40450] (JMW) [Entered: 06/21/2021 08:29 AM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [9596933-2] NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Argustus Charles Choyce. [9596933-1] [21-40450] (DMS) [Entered: 06/15/2021 11:27 AM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Argustus Charles Choyce [21-40450] (RLL) [Entered: 06/11/2021 09:55 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
