Decker v. PepsiCo
| Alan Ray Decker |
| PepsiCo, Incorporated |
| 21-40482 |
| June 21, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-40482] (CMB) [Entered: 08/17/2021 12:21 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 09/27/2021 for Appellant Alan Ray Decker. [21-40482] (CMB) [Entered: 08/17/2021 12:23 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER granting Motion to reopen case filed by Appellant Mr. Alan Ray Decker [ # 9640257-2 ] [21-40482] (CCR) [Entered: 08/11/2021 03:47 PM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Alan Ray Decker to proceed in forma pauperis [9640843-2]. Date of service: 08/04/2021 [21-40482] (CCR) [Entered: 08/11/2021 03:59 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:19-CV-378. Electronic ROA due on 08/26/2021. [21-40482] (CCR) [Entered: 08/11/2021 04:01 PM] |
| OPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Alan Ray Decker to reopen case [9640257-2] Default has NOT been remedied. Date of service: 07/19/2021 [21-40482] (CCR) [Entered: 08/11/2021 11:12 AM] |
| AFFIDAVIT OF FINANCIAL STATUS filed by Appellant Mr. Alan Ray Decker in support of the Motion to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Mr. Alan Ray Decker in 21-40482 [ # 9640843-2 ].. [21-40482] (CCR) [Entered: 08/11/2021 04:00 PM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the finiancial affidavit received from Appellant Mr. Alan Ray Decker because the case was dismissed on 7/15/21 [21-40482] (CCR) [Entered: 07/27/2021 02:09 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER dismissing appeal pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 42 for failure to pay fee [9619914-2] [21-40482] (CCR) [Entered: 07/15/2021 12:23 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Dennis Sean Dresden for PepsiCo, Incorporated for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-40482] (Dennis Sean Dresden ) [Entered: 07/01/2021 10:04 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Dennis Sean Dresden for Appellee PepsiCo, Incorporated in 21-40482 [21-40482] (CCR) [Entered: 07/01/2021 04:45 PM] |
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 06/21/2021 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Alan Ray Decker. [21-40482] (JMW) [Entered: 06/24/2021 12:49 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9604714-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 07/09/2021 for Appellant Alan Ray Decker. Transcript order due on 07/09/2021 for Appellant Alan Ray Decker [21-40482] (JMW) [Entered: 06/24/2021 12:51 PM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Alan Ray Decker [21-40482] (RLL) [Entered: 06/21/2021 03:23 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Decker v. PepsiCo | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Alan Ray Decker | |
| Represented By: | Alan Ray Decker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: PepsiCo, Incorporated | |
| Represented By: | Dennis Sean Dresden |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
