USA v. Sepulveda
| United States of America |
| Matthew Lee Sepulveda |
| 21-40574 |
| July 29, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9631353-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 08/16/2021 for Appellant Matthew Lee Sepulveda [21-40574] (ABT) [Entered: 07/30/2021 10:08 AM] |
| DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Matthew Lee Sepulveda [21-40574] (ABT) [Entered: 07/29/2021 06:29 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Sepulveda | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Carmen Castillo Mitchell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: Matthew Lee Sepulveda | |
| Represented By: | Carlos Andres Garcia Esq. Sr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
