Searcy v. Paxton
| Lisa Marie Searcy |
| Texas Attorney General Warren Kenneth Paxton, Jr., Helen Truscott, Attorney, Jennifer Burnett, Attorney, Jana Wheeler and Mark Aronowitz, Attorney |
| 21-40602 |
| August 13, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER reopening case [9679753-2] [21-40602] (CCR) [Entered: 10/01/2021 03:25 PM] |
| IN ACCORDANCE WITH 5TH CIRCUIT RULE 42.3.1, the appeal is subject to dismissal in 15 days for failure to comply with the initial written deadline. Fee deadline updated to 10/18/2021 for Appellant Lisa Marie Searcy [21-40602] (CCR) [Entered: 10/01/2021 03:26 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER dismissing appeal pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 42 for failure to pay fee [9677164-2] [21-40602] (CCR) [Entered: 09/29/2021 01:25 PM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the received under separate covers, is an inquiry on the dealine for fee; Request for Correction of Judicial Misconduct of Strikes; Correspondence objecting to the docketing notice issued advising of the 3 strikes with her request to correct this error; and an appearance form all received from Appellant Ms. Lisa Marie Searcy. While the objection to strikes obtained is her disagreement that the cases were frivolous, any attempt to challenge them would have needed to be done upon entry of each strike. She will remain subject to the provision. The fee is due by 10/18/21 and the portion regarding a judicial complaint, will be addressed under separate cover. Pro se parties are not required to file appearance forms. [21-40602] (DLM) [Entered: 10/07/2021 09:04 AM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken on the 8/17/21 letter received from Appellant Ms. Lisa Marie Searcy asking for a refund of the $402 filing fee for the complaint filed in district court and request for a writ of certiorari to be sent. Any attempt to obtain a refund of the filing fee paid for the filing of an original complaint must be directed to the district court. Further, there is no form to be sent for the filing of a petition for writ of certiorari. Any attemp to filing this type petition must be both captioned and filed directly with the Supreme Court. [21-40602] (DLM) [Entered: 09/09/2021 11:17 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9659582-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 09/23/2021 for Appellant Lisa Marie Searcy [21-40602] (ABT) [Entered: 09/08/2021 04:51 PM] |
| PARTY LIMIT CASE. (FOR A FULL LIST OF PARTIES FOR THIS APPEAL, PLEASE REFER TO THE DISTRICT COURT'S DOCKET SHEET.) [21-40602] (ABT) [Entered: 08/13/2021 05:42 PM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Lisa Marie Searcy [21-40602] (ABT) [Entered: 08/13/2021 05:41 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
