Murray v. Lumpkin
Petitioner / Appellant: Warren Jordan Murray
Respondent / Appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Case Number: 21-40611
Filed: August 18, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 8, 2021 LETTER OF ADVISEMENT. Reason: advising the checklist is for filing a appellant's merits brief. In accordance with the clerk's notice of 9/13/21 the motion for a certificate of appealability with brief in support are due 10/25/21 [21-40611] (MRW) [Entered: 10/11/2021 11:56 AM]
September 20, 2021 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Motion for Extension of Time received from Appellant Mr. Warren Jordan Murray because crossed in the mail with the clerk's notice of September 13, 2021 [21-40611] (MRW) [Entered: 09/21/2021 09:10 AM]
September 16, 2021 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No State Court Papers included? Yes. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-40611] (MRW) [Entered: 09/16/2021 02:04 PM]
September 13, 2021 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:20-CV-352. Electronic ROA due on 09/28/2021. [21-40611] (CCR) [Entered: 09/13/2021 10:35 AM]
September 13, 2021 LETTER ISSUED. Motion for COA and brief in support are required. Motion due on 10/25/2021 for Appellant Warren Jordan Murray. Brief in Support due on 10/25/2021 for Appellant Warren Jordan Murray [21-40611] (CCR) [Entered: 09/13/2021 10:31 AM]
September 13, 2021 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 08/31/2021 granting IFP for Appellant Mr. Warren Jordan Murray. [21-40611] (CCR) [Entered: 09/13/2021 10:30 AM]
August 27, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Stephanie Wawrzynski for Appellee Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division in 21-40611 [21-40611] (ABT) [Entered: 08/27/2021 01:14 PM]
August 26, 2021 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9653753-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. [21-40611] (CCR) [Entered: 08/26/2021 12:16 PM]
August 26, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Stephanie Wawrzynski for Mr. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-40611] (Stephanie Wawrzynski ) [Entered: 08/26/2021 03:32 PM]
August 18, 2021 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Warren Jordan Murray [21-40611] (SDH) [Entered: 08/18/2021 08:03 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Murray v. Lumpkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: Warren Jordan Murray
Represented By: Warren Jordan Murray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Represented By: Stephanie Wawrzynski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?