Habiniak v. Ramirez
| Michael Habiniak |
| Mario E. Ramirez, Jr., Judge, C. Wesley Kittleman, Attorney, Carlos Yzaguirre, Attorney, David J. Lumber, Attorney, James P. Grissom, Attorney, William A. Csabi, Attorney, Kittleman, Thomas & Gonzalez Law Firm, Guerra Law Group, P.L.L.C., Texas National Bank, Arsenio Afaro, Heirberto Alaniz, Hector Guerra, Sr., Hector Guerra, Jr., Candelario Ontiveros, Joe Quiroga, Abel Rodriguez, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Texas National Bank Board of Directors, MNB Ventures, Incorporated, Atlas & Hall Law Firm, Atlas, Hall & Rodriguez, L.L.P., David J. Bradley, Micaela Alvarez, Charles Murray, Missy Medary, Laura Hinojosa and Randy Crane, U.S. District Judge |
| 21-40678 |
| September 16, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER denying Motion to amend caption filed by Appellant Mr. Michael Habiniak [ # 9699092-2 ] [21-40678] (RLL) [Entered: 10/29/2021 10:58 AM] |
| UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Michael Habiniak to amend caption [9699092-2]. Date of service: 10/20/2021 [21-40678] (RLL) [Entered: 10/27/2021 12:55 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? Yes. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-40678] (DDL) [Entered: 10/21/2021 03:46 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 11/30/2021 for Appellant Michael Habiniak. [21-40678] (DDL) [Entered: 10/21/2021 03:47 PM] |
| ATTORNEY NOT PARTICIPATING. Mr. James Patrick Grissom is designated as inactive in this case. Reason:Attorney can not be located.[21-40678] (DMS) [Entered: 10/13/2021 11:21 AM] |
| COURT ORDER FILED: IT IS ORDERED that Appellee, Atlas & Hall Law Firm's unopposed motion to correct name to Atlas, Hall & Rodriguez, L.L.P. is GRANTED. [ # 9685161-3 ] in 21-40678 [21-40678] (DMS) [Entered: 10/13/2021 11:30 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Joel Joseph Vale Jr. for Appellee Charles Murray in 21-40678, Attorney Joel Joseph Vale Jr. for Appellee Atlas & Hall Law Firm in 21-40678 [21-40678] (DMS) [Entered: 10/12/2021 09:38 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney David Louis Guerra for Appellee Office of the Comptroller of the Currency in 21-40678 [21-40678] (DMS) [Entered: 10/12/2021 09:35 AM] |
| UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellee Atlas & Hall Law Firm to substitute Atlas & Hall Law Firm with Atlas, Hall & Rodriguez, LLP. [21-40678] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellees Atlas & Hall Law Firm and Mr. Charles Murray to amend caption [9685161-2]. Date of service: 10/08/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Brooks, Cowan, Garza, Grissom, Guerra, Harris, Lindsey, Lumber, McGurk, Murray, Pumarejo, Vale, Vela, Yzaguirre; US mail - Appellant Habiniak [21-40678] (Joel Joseph Vale Jr.) [Entered: 10/08/2021 01:44 PM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Motion received from Appellees Atlas & Hall Law Firm and Mr. Charles Murray because Attorney filed another motion and this one is no longer needed. [21-40678] (DMS) [Entered: 10/08/2021 03:09 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-40678] (David Louis Guerra ) [Entered: 10/08/2021 11:22 AM] |
| Attorney Joel Vale added as counsel of record for Appellees Atlas & Hall Law Firm and Charles Murray in 21-40678 [21-40678] (ABT) [Entered: 10/08/2021 10:33 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-40678] (Joel Joseph Vale Jr.) [Entered: 10/08/2021 09:16 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-40678] (Joseph Brooks ) [Entered: 10/05/2021 12:45 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Joseph Brooks for party(s) Appellee FDIC, in case 21-40678. [21-40678] (SEP) [Entered: 10/07/2021 03:58 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Michael Habiniak advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Transcript Order ddl satisfied [21-40678] (DMS) [Entered: 10/04/2021 08:44 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 7:14-CV-69, 7:15-CV-299, 7:17-CV-343. Electronic ROA due on 10/19/2021. [21-40678] (DMS) [Entered: 10/04/2021 08:46 AM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Motion received from Appellant Mr. Michael Habiniak because Premature [21-40678] (DMS) [Entered: 10/05/2021 04:12 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9672629-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 10/12/2021 for Appellant Michael Habiniak [21-40678] (DMS) [Entered: 09/24/2021 08:47 AM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Appellees MNB Ventures, Incorporated, Atlas & Hall Law Firm, David J. Bradley, Micaela Alvarez, Charles Murray, Missy Medary, Laura Hinojosa and Randy Crane added to case. Reason: Cases should have been opened as single case, adding parties from other cases. [21-40678] (WMJ) [Entered: 09/22/2021 09:58 AM] |
| Attorney Carlos Yzaguirre, David Lumber, James Grissom, and Ricardo Pumarejo added as counsel of record for Appellees Joe Quiroga, Candelario Ontiveros, James P. Grissom, Kittleman, Thomas & Gonzalez Law Firm and C. Wesley Kittleman in 21-40678 [21-40678] (WMJ) [Entered: 09/22/2021 10:04 AM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed 09/14/2021. [9666679-2] NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Michael Habiniak. [9666679-1] [21-40678] (RLL) [Entered: 09/16/2021 05:46 PM] |
| CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Michael Habiniak [21-40678] (WMJ) [Entered: 09/16/2021 02:49 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
