Joseph Peeples, IIIIn re: Joseph Peeples, III
| In re: Joseph W Peeples, III |
| 21-40697 |
| September 21, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT of Petition for writ of mandamus [ # 9669251-2 ] filed by Petitioner Mr. Joseph W Peeples, III [21-40697] (DLM) [Entered: 09/21/2021 09:53 AM] |
| PETITION filed by Petitioner Mr. Joseph W Peeples, III for writ of mandamus [9669251-2] Date received in 5th Circuit: 09/20/2021. Fee due on 10/21/2021 for Petitioner Joseph W Peeples III. Sufficient Mtn/Resp/Reply due on 10/21/2021 for Petitioner Joseph W Peeples III. Date of Service: 09/13/2021 Document is insufficient for the following reasons: Needs a corrected certificate of service and filing fee [21-40697] (DLM) [Entered: 09/21/2021 09:43 AM] |
| ORIGINAL PROCEEDING CASE docketed. [21-40697] (DLM) [Entered: 09/21/2021 09:37 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Joseph Peeples, IIIIn re: Joseph Peeples, III | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: Joseph W Peeples, III | |
| Represented By: | Joseph W. Peeples III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
