USA v. Gutierrez
| United States of America |
| Rudy Gutierrez, also known as Rudolpho Gutierrez |
| 21-40788 |
| October 25, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Rudy Gutierrez for certificate of appealability [9724616-2]. Motion due deadline satisfied. [21-40788] (MRW) [Entered: 12/02/2021 11:05 AM] |
| BRIEF IN SUPPORT filed by Appellant Mr. Rudy Gutierrez in support of Motion for certificate of appealability [ # 9724616-2 ] (INCORPORATED IN MOTION FOR COA) Brief in Support deadline satisfied. [9724619-1] [21-40788] (MRW) [Entered: 12/02/2021 11:06 AM] |
| LETTER filed by Appellant Mr. Rudy Gutierrez advising to file the Motion for certificate of appealability treated as NOA received 10/25/21 as the motion for a certificate of appealability in 21-40788 [ # 9724616-2 ]. [21-40788] (MRW) [Entered: 12/02/2021 11:09 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? Yes. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-40788] (CMB) [Entered: 11/24/2021 10:08 AM] |
| LETTER OF ADVISEMENT. Reason: Letter referring to the filing fee for his motion for COA. The COA documents initially received on 10/6/21, were transmitted to the district court for filing as a notice of appeal. If he would like to have the same document filed as his COA documents for the appeal, a written request to do so will be required. [21-40788] (DLM) [Entered: 11/10/2021 01:01 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 2:10-CV-56. Electronic ROA due on 11/24/2021. [21-40788] (DMS) [Entered: 11/09/2021 04:06 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9708768-2] [21-40788] (DMS) [Entered: 11/09/2021 04:04 PM] |
| LETTER ISSUED. Motion for COA and brief in support are required. Motion due on 12/20/2021 for Appellant Rudy Gutierrez. Brief in Support due on 12/20/2021 for Appellant Rudy Gutierrez [21-40788] (DMS) [Entered: 11/09/2021 04:00 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9708762-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [21-40788] (DMS) [Entered: 11/09/2021 04:00 PM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [9704166-2] NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Rudy Gutierrez. [9704166-1] [21-40788] (CCR) [Entered: 11/03/2021 12:07 PM] |
| FEE PAID by Appellant Mr. Rudy Gutierrez in the district court on 10/28/21. [21-40788] (DLM) [Entered: 11/03/2021 03:54 PM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Rudy Gutierrez [21-40788] (RLL) [Entered: 10/25/2021 12:39 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Gutierrez | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Carmen Castillo Mitchell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: Rudy Gutierrez, also known as Rudolpho Gutierrez | |
| Represented By: | Rudy Gutierrez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
