Davis v. Lumpkin
Petitioner / Appellant: Johnny Lee Davis
Respondent / Appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Case Number: 21-40809
Filed: October 27, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 7, 2021 LETTER OF ADVISEMENT. Reason: 11/30/21 Correspondence seeking confirmation of receipt of appellant's COA documents and for a copy of the first page of the motion. While we do not provide complimentary copies, we are this one timely, sending a copy of the first page of the COA document filed [21-40809] (DLM) [Entered: 12/07/2021 01:00 PM]
November 12, 2021 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Johnny Lee Davis for certificate of appealability [9714796-2]. Date of service: 11/06/2021 Motion due deadline satisfied. [21-40809] (DLM) [Entered: 11/17/2021 04:25 PM]
November 12, 2021 BRIEF IN SUPPORT filed by Appellant Mr. Johnny Lee Davis in support of Motion for certificate of appealability [ # 9714796-2 ] (INCORPORATED IN MOTION FOR COA) Brief in Support deadline satisfied. Date of Service: 11/06/2021. [9714798-1] [21-40809] (DLM) [Entered: 11/17/2021 04:26 PM]
November 12, 2021 EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT of Motion for certificate of appealability [ # 9714796-2 ] filed by Appellant Mr. Johnny Lee Davis [21-40809] (DLM) [Entered: 11/17/2021 04:26 PM]
November 10, 2021 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No State Court Papers included? Yes. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-40809] (MRW) [Entered: 11/10/2021 01:55 PM]
November 8, 2021 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 2:20-CV-162. Electronic ROA due on 11/23/2021. [21-40809] (CAG) [Entered: 11/08/2021 03:27 PM]
November 8, 2021 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9707589-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Motion due on 12/20/2021 for Appellant Johnny Lee Davis. Brief in Support due on 12/20/2021 for Appellant Johnny Lee Davis [21-40809] (CAG) [Entered: 11/08/2021 03:24 PM]
October 29, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Patrick Daniel Todd for party(s) Appellee Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, in case 21-40809 [21-40809] (CB) [Entered: 10/29/2021 11:20 AM]
October 28, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-40809] (Patrick Daniel Todd ) [Entered: 10/28/2021 08:18 AM]
October 27, 2021 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Johnny Lee Davis [21-40809] (ABT) [Entered: 10/27/2021 04:09 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Davis v. Lumpkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: Johnny Lee Davis
Represented By: Johnny Lee Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Represented By: Casey Leigh Jackson Solomon
Represented By: Patrick Daniel Todd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?