Walker v. Lumpkin
Petitioner / Appellant: Brian Evan Walker
Respondent / Appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Case Number: 21-40858
Filed: November 18, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 12, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Molly Knowles for Appellee Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division in 21-40858 [21-40858] (ABT) [Entered: 01/12/2022 10:24 AM]
January 11, 2022 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No State Court Papers included? Yes. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-40858] (CMB) [Entered: 01/11/2022 11:38 AM]
January 11, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Molly Knowles for Mr. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-40858] (Molly Knowles ) [Entered: 01/11/2022 01:08 PM]
January 10, 2022 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:18-CV-526. Electronic ROA due on 01/25/2022. [21-40858] (ABT) [Entered: 01/10/2022 12:04 PM]
January 10, 2022 LETTER ISSUED. Motion for COA and brief in support are required. Motion due on 02/22/2022 for Appellant Brian Evan Walker. Brief in Support due on 02/22/2022 for Appellant Brian Evan Walker. Fee deadline updated to 02/22/2022 for Appellant Brian Evan Walker [21-40858] (ABT) [Entered: 01/10/2022 12:00 PM]
January 10, 2022 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 01/07/2022 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Brian Evan Walker. [21-40858] (ABT) [Entered: 01/10/2022 11:59 AM]
December 20, 2021 FORWARDING MOTION for IFP received from Appellant Mr. Brian Evan Walker to the District Court for filing. Fee deadline canceled. [21-40858] (DLM) [Entered: 12/29/2021 10:03 AM]
December 13, 2021 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 5TH CIRCUIT RULE 42.3.1, the appeal is subject to dismissal in 15 days for failure to comply with the initial written deadline. Fee deadline updated to 12/22/2021 for Appellant Brian Evan Walker [21-40858] (ABT) [Entered: 12/13/2021 01:55 PM]
November 22, 2021 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9717543-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 12/07/2021 for Appellant Brian Evan Walker [21-40858] (ABT) [Entered: 11/22/2021 07:57 AM]
November 18, 2021 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Brian Evan Walker [21-40858] (RLL) [Entered: 11/18/2021 04:40 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Walker v. Lumpkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: Brian Evan Walker
Represented By: Brian Evan Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Represented By: Molly Knowles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?