Banks v. Lumpkin
Petitioner / Appellant: Emmett Jeffrey Banks
Respondent / Appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Case Number: 21-50085
Filed: February 10, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 8, 2021 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Emmett Jeffrey Banks for leave to file attached exhibits to support his claims [9545700-2]. [21-50085] (CNF) [Entered: 04/08/2021 09:42 AM]
March 18, 2021 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Emmett Jeffrey Banks to amend Brief in Support of COA [ # 9518063-2 ] [9531052-2]. [21-50085] (CNF) [Entered: 03/22/2021 08:35 AM]
March 11, 2021 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No State Court Papers included? Yes. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-50085] (MRW) [Entered: 03/11/2021 01:15 PM]
March 9, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Sarah Miranda Harp for party(s) Appellee Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, in case 21-50085 [21-50085] (CAS) [Entered: 03/09/2021 11:35 AM]
March 8, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-50085] (Sarah Miranda Harp ) [Entered: 03/08/2021 11:57 AM]
March 5, 2021 BRIEF IN SUPPORT filed by Appellant Mr. Emmett Jeffrey Banks in support of Motion for certificate of appealability [ # 9518061-2 ] Brief in Support deadline satisfied. [9518063-1] [21-50085] (CNF) [Entered: 03/05/2021 10:14 AM]
March 5, 2021 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Emmett Jeffrey Banks for certificate of appealability [9518061-2]. Motion due deadline satisfied. [21-50085] (CNF) [Entered: 03/05/2021 10:13 AM]
February 23, 2021 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9509937-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [21-50085] (CAS) [Entered: 02/23/2021 03:33 PM]
February 23, 2021 LETTER ISSUED. Motion for COA and brief in support are required. Motion due on 04/05/2021 for Appellant Emmett Jeffrey Banks. Brief in Support due on 04/05/2021 for Appellant Emmett Jeffrey Banks [21-50085] (CAS) [Entered: 02/23/2021 03:35 PM]
February 23, 2021 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 5:20-CV-852. Electronic ROA due on 03/10/2021. [21-50085] (CAS) [Entered: 02/23/2021 03:37 PM]
February 10, 2021 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Emmett Jeffrey Banks [21-50085] (LEF) [Entered: 02/10/2021 02:59 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Banks v. Lumpkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: Emmett Jeffrey Banks
Represented By: Emmett Jeffrey Banks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Represented By: Edward Larry Marshall
Represented By: Sarah Miranda Harp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?