Moon v. Olivarez
| Brandon Lee Moon |
| John Doe, City of El Paso, Sergio Reyes, Edie Rubalcalba, William E. Rodriguez, Salvador Olivarez, Steve Simmons, Assistant District Attorney John Davis, Gilbert Sanchez, Detective Jeffrey Dove, Ron Urbanovsky, Omar Garcia, Frank Aguilera, Jaime Esparaza, Glen Adams, Richard Wiles, Assistant District Attorney John Edd Boaz and County of El Paso |
| 21-50193 |
| March 12, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellant Mr. Brandon Lee Moon. Extension Granted to and including 06/28/2021. A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 06/28/2021 for Appellant Brandon Lee Moon [21-50193] (SB) [Entered: 05/05/2021 03:10 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 05/17/2021 for Appellant Brandon Lee Moon. [21-50193] (CMB) [Entered: 04/07/2021 12:24 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? Yes Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-50193] (CMB) [Entered: 04/07/2021 12:20 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney David Pierce for Appellee Jeffrey Dove in 21-50193, Attorney David Pierce for Appellee Salvador Olivarez in 21-50193 [21-50193] (LLL) [Entered: 04/01/2021 04:58 PM] |
| ATTORNEY NOT PARTICIPATING. Duan Baker is designated as inactive in this case. Reason:no admitted to this court; co-counsel David Pierce is admitted. [21-50193] (MVM) [Entered: 03/30/2021 02:30 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-50193] (David Pierce ) [Entered: 03/30/2021 02:53 PM] |
| ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Appellant Mr. Brandon Lee Moonfor the Court to process. Date of service: 03/24/2021 via US mail - Attorney for Appellee: Baker; email - Attorney for Appellants: Cochran, Martinez, Webre; Attorney for Appellee: Pierce. [21-50193] (William Gray Cochran ) [Entered: 03/24/2021 02:39 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Brandon Lee Moon advising transcript unnecessary [21-50193] (MVM) [Entered: 03/24/2021 03:03 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney William Gray Cochran for Appellant Brandon Lee Moon in 21-50193 [21-50193] (MVM) [Entered: 03/22/2021 09:37 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Jane Webre for party(s) Appellant Brandon Lee Moon, in case 21-50193 [21-50193] (MVM) [Entered: 03/22/2021 09:40 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9529112-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [21-50193] (MVM) [Entered: 03/18/2021 12:03 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 5:06-CV-925. Electronic ROA due on 04/02/2021. [21-50193] (MVM) [Entered: 03/18/2021 12:18 PM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Involvement terminated for Appellees City of El Paso, County of El Paso, William E. Rodriguez, Richard Wiles, John Davis, John Edd Boaz, Frank Aguilera, Omar Garcia, Edie Rubalcalba, Sergio Reyes, Ron Urbanovsky, Glen Adams, Steve Simmons, Jaime Esparaza, Gilbert Sanchez and John Doe in 21-50193. Reason: per Appellant, the only appellees to this appeal are Salvador Olivarez and Jeffrey Dove. [21-50193] (MVM) [Entered: 03/18/2021 02:00 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. William Gray Cochran for Mr. Brandon Lee Moon for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-50193] (William Gray Cochran ) [Entered: 03/18/2021 03:53 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [21-50193] (Jane Webre ) [Entered: 03/18/2021 04:38 PM] |
| CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Brandon Lee Moon [21-50193] (MBC) [Entered: 03/12/2021 02:34 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.