USA v. Alberto-Hernandez
| Rey David Alberto-Hernandez, also known as Rey David Hernandez-Alberto |
| United States of America |
| 21-50306 |
| April 16, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Rey David Alberto-Hernandez to consolidate cases 21-50306 and 21-50307 for briefing and oral argument purposes. Date of service: 04/23/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Bogan, Franco; Attorney for Appellee: Gay [21-50306] (Bradford W. Bogan ) [Entered: 04/23/2021 03:18 PM] |
| COURT REPORTER ACKNOWLEDGMENT received from Court Reporter Mrs. Ann Record. [21-50306] (Ann Record ) [Entered: 04/21/2021 12:12 PM] |
| ACKNOWLEDGMENT. Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Ann Record, Est. Completion Dt: 05/21/2021, Est. No.of Pgs: 7, Dt. Fin Arrangements Made: 04/21/2021, Dt. Trans. to be Filed: 05/21/2021, Proceeding Type and Date: Revocation Hearing 03/22/2021. Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment ddl satisfied. Transcript Due/Court Reporter Discount Date is 05/21/2021 for Ann Record, Court Reporter. [21-50306] (SEP) [Entered: 04/22/2021 08:07 AM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Rey David Alberto-Hernandez. DETAILS: Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Ann Record, Proceeding Type and Date: Revocation Hearing 03/22/2021. Transcript Order ddl satisfied. Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment due on 05/03/2021 for Ann Record, Court Reporter. Electronic Filing Processed: [ # 9555131-2 ] [21-50306] (MRW) [Entered: 04/21/2021 09:36 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9555459-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 05/06/2021 for Appellant Rey David Alberto-Hernandez [21-50306] (MRW) [Entered: 04/21/2021 09:32 AM] |
| ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Appellant Mr. Rey David Alberto-Hernandezfor the Court to process. Date of service: 04/20/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Franco; Attorney for Appellee: Gay. [21-50306] (Maureen Scott Franco ) [Entered: 04/20/2021 04:11 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-50306] (Bradford W. Bogan ) [Entered: 04/20/2021 04:31 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Bradford W. Bogan for party(s) Appellant Rey David Alberto-Hernandez, in case 21-50306. [21-50306] (SEP) [Entered: 04/21/2021 03:58 PM] |
| DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Rey David Alberto-Hernandez [21-50306] (RAJ) [Entered: 04/16/2021 12:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Alberto-Hernandez | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: Rey David Alberto-Hernandez, also known as Rey David Hernandez-Alberto | |
| Represented By: | Maureen Scott Franco |
| Represented By: | Bradford W. Bogan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Joseph H. Gay Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
