Preston Hollow v. Cottonwood Devel
| Cottonwood Development Corporation and City of Hutto |
| Preston Hollow Capital, L.L.C. |
| 21-50389 |
| May 12, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Preston Hollow Capital, LLC v. Cottonwood Development Corp.
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER granting Motion to extend time to file appellee's brief filed by Appellees City of Hutto and Cottonwood Development Corporation [ # 9588937-2 ] Appellee's Brief due on 07/15/2021 for Appellees City of Hutto and Cottonwood Development Corporation [21-50389] (LEF) [Entered: 06/04/2021 09:16 AM] |
| UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellees City of Hutto and Cottonwood Development Corporation to extend time to file brief of appellee until 07/15/2021 [9588937-2]. Date of service: 06/03/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Bullock, Hyde, Needle; Attorney for Appellants: Coale, Hardy, Pinker [21-50389] (Bradford Eugene Bullock ) [Entered: 06/03/2021 05:17 PM] |
| RECORD EXCERPTS FILED. [21-50389] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: RECORD EXCERPTS FILED by Appellant Preston Hollow Capital, L.L.C.. Date of service: 06/01/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Bullock, Hyde, Needle; Attorney for Appellants: Coale, Hardy, Pinker [21-50389] (David Steven Coale ) [Entered: 06/01/2021 03:42 PM] |
| APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied. Appellee's Brief due on 07/01/2021 for Appellees City of Hutto and Cottonwood Development Corporation [21-50389] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Preston Hollow Capital, L.L.C.. Date of service: 06/01/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Bullock, Hyde, Needle; Attorney for Appellants: Coale, Hardy, Pinker [21-50389] (David Steven Coale ) [Entered: 06/01/2021 03:40 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Jonathan William Needle for party(s) Appellee Cottonwood Development Corporation Appellee City of Hutto, in case 21-50389 [21-50389] (LEF) [Entered: 05/27/2021 04:49 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [21-50389] (Jonathan William Needle ) [Entered: 05/26/2021 02:49 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Bradford Eugene Bullock for party(s) Appellee Cottonwood Development Corporation Appellee City of Hutto, in case 21-50389 [21-50389] (LEF) [Entered: 05/25/2021 11:16 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney George Edward Hyde for Appellee City of Hutto in 21-50389, Attorney George Edward Hyde for Appellee Cottonwood Development Corporation in 21-50389 [21-50389] (LEF) [Entered: 05/25/2021 11:13 AM] |
| Attorney Jonathan W. Needle is advised to resubmit an appearance form. Reason: The submitted appearance form does not match the registered attorney. [21-50389] (BF) [Entered: 05/25/2021 08:39 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) David Steven Coale for party(s) Appellant Preston Hollow Capital, L.L.C., in case 21-50389 [21-50389] (LEF) [Entered: 05/24/2021 04:39 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Eric Wolf Pinker for Appellant Preston Hollow Capital, L.L.C. in 21-50389 [21-50389] (LEF) [Entered: 05/24/2021 04:41 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Samuel Butler Hardy IV for party(s) Appellant Preston Hollow Capital, L.L.C., in case 21-50389 [21-50389] (LEF) [Entered: 05/24/2021 04:37 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [21-50389] (Bradford Eugene Bullock ) [Entered: 05/24/2021 01:23 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [21-50389] (Bradford Eugene Bullock ) [Entered: 05/24/2021 01:19 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. George Edward Hyde, Esq. for City of Hutto and Cottonwood Development Corporation for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-50389] (George Edward Hyde ) [Entered: 05/24/2021 01:15 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [21-50389] (Samuel Butler Hardy IV) [Entered: 05/24/2021 12:13 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [21-50389] (David Steven Coale ) [Entered: 05/24/2021 07:54 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-50389] (Eric Wolf Pinker ) [Entered: 05/24/2021 07:46 AM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 06/28/2021 for Appellant Preston Hollow Capital, L.L.C.. [21-50389] (DDL) [Entered: 05/19/2021 01:10 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-50389] (DDL) [Entered: 05/19/2021 01:09 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 1:20-CV-978. Electronic ROA due on 06/01/2021. [21-50389] (LEF) [Entered: 05/17/2021 11:06 AM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Transcript Order ddl satisfied [21-50389] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Preston Hollow Capital, L.L.C. advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Date of Service: 05/17/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Hyde; Attorney for Appellant: Pinker [21-50389] (Eric Wolf Pinker ) [Entered: 05/17/2021 09:44 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9575234-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 06/01/2021 for Appellant Preston Hollow Capital, L.L.C. [21-50389] (LEF) [Entered: 05/14/2021 04:48 PM] |
| CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Preston Hollow Capital, L.L.C. [21-50389] (LEF) [Entered: 05/12/2021 08:19 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
