Inmobiliaria Buda v. Brown
| Inmobiliaria Buda S. de R.L.de C.V. and Inmobiliaria Dona Lucha S. de R.L. de C.V |
| Sarah Ellen Brown, Caleb Preston and Jennifer Campbell |
| 21-50660 |
| July 26, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER granting Motion to extend time to file appellant's brief filed by Appellants Inmobiliaria Buda S. de R.L.de C.V. and Inmobiliaria Dona Lucha S. de R.L. de C.V [ # 9668986-2 ] A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 10/12/2021 for Appellants Inmobiliaria Buda S. de R.L.de C.V. and Inmobiliaria Dona Lucha S. de R.L. de C.V [21-50660] (LLL) [Entered: 09/21/2021 04:12 PM] |
| OPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellants Inmobiliaria Buda S. de R.L.de C.V. and Inmobiliaria Dona Lucha S. de R.L. de C.V to extend time to file brief as appellant until 10/12/2021 [9668986-2]. Date of service: 09/20/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Liu; Attorney for Appellants: Tico, Williams; US mail - Attorney for Appellee: Liu [21-50660] (Michael Matthew Williams ) [Entered: 09/20/2021 11:43 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Michael Matthew Williams for Appellant Inmobiliaria Dona Lucha S. de R.L. de C.V in 21-50660, Attorney Michael Matthew Williams for Appellant Inmobiliaria Buda S. de R.L.de C.V. in 21-50660 [21-50660] (RSM) [Entered: 09/17/2021 12:32 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Melissa Olaes Tico for party(s) Appellant Inmobiliaria Buda S. de R.L.de C.V., in case 21-50660 [21-50660] (RSM) [Entered: 09/17/2021 12:45 PM] |
| Attorney Mr. Michael Matthew Williams for Appellants Inmobiliaria Buda S. de R.L.de C.V. and Inmobiliaria Dona Lucha S. de R.L. de C.V Attorney Melissa O. Tico is advised to resubmit an appearance form. [21-50660] (CJM) [Entered: 09/16/2021 09:10 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [21-50660] (Melissa Olaes Tico ) [Entered: 09/16/2021 10:17 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Michael Matthew Williams for Inmobiliaria Buda S. de R.L.de C.V. and Inmobiliaria Dona Lucha S. de R.L. de C.V for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-50660] (Michael Matthew Williams ) [Entered: 09/14/2021 04:15 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [21-50660] (Michael Matthew Williams ) [Entered: 09/14/2021 04:13 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 09/27/2021 for Appellants Inmobiliaria Buda S. de R.L.de C.V. and Inmobiliaria Dona Lucha S. de R.L. de C.V. [21-50660] (CMB) [Entered: 08/18/2021 12:53 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-50660] (CMB) [Entered: 08/18/2021 12:51 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Cory Ren Liu for Appellee Jennifer Campbell in 21-50660, Attorney Cory Ren Liu for Appellee Caleb Preston in 21-50660, Attorney Cory Ren Liu for Appellee Sarah Ellen Brown in 21-50660 [21-50660] (MVM) [Entered: 08/11/2021 01:56 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-50660] (Cory Liu ) [Entered: 08/10/2021 12:53 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9631637-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [21-50660] (RSM) [Entered: 07/30/2021 12:43 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 1:20-CV-806. Electronic ROA due on 08/16/2021. [21-50660] (RSM) [Entered: 07/30/2021 12:49 PM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellants Inmobiliaria Buda S. de R.L.de C.V. and Inmobiliaria Dona Lucha S. de R.L. de C.V [21-50660] (MBC) [Entered: 07/26/2021 10:14 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
