In re: Penny Clarkston
| In re: Penny Clarkston and Mark Lee Dickson |
| Whole Woman's Health, on behalf of itself, its staff, physicians, nurses, and patients, Alamo City Surgery Center, P.L.L.C., on behalf of itself, its staff, physicians, nurses, and patients, doing business as Alamo Women's Reproductive Services, Brookside Women's Medical Center, P.A., on behalf of itself, its staff, physicians, nurses, and patients, doing business as Brookside Women's Health Center and Austin Women's Health Center, Houston Women's Clinic, on behalf of itself, its staff, physicians, nurses, and patients, Houston Women's Reproductive Services, on behalf of itself, its staff, physicians, nurses, and patients, Planned Parenthood Center for Choice, on behalf of itself, its staff, physicians, nurses, and patients, Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Surgical Health Services, on behalf of itself, its staff, physicians, nurses, and patients, Planned Parenthood South Texas Surgical Center, on behalf of itself, its staff, physicians, nurses, and patients, Southwestern Women's Surgery Center, on behalf of itself, its staff, physicians, nurses, and patients, Whole Woman's Health Alliance, on behalf of itself, its staff, physicians, nurses, and patients, M.D. Allison Gilbert, on behlaf of herself and her patients, M.D. Bhavik Kumar, on behalf of himself and his patients, Afiya Center, on behalf of itself and its staff, Frontera Fund, on behalf of itself and its staff, Fund Texas Choice, on behalf of itself and its staff, Jane's Due Process, on behalf of itself and its staff, Lilith Fund, Incorporated, on behalf of itself and its staff, North Texas Equal Access Fund, on behalf of itself and its staff, Reverend Erika Forbes, Reverend Daniel Kanter and Marva Sadler |
| 21-50708 |
| August 7, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| RESPONSE/OPPOSITION filed by District Judge Honorable Robert L. Pitman [9638512-1] to the Petition for writ of mandamus filed by Petitioners Ms. Penny Clarkston and Mr. Mark Lee Dickson in 21-50708 [ # 9637533-2 ] [21-50708] (MBC) [Entered: 08/09/2021 03:53 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Richard Muniz for party(s) Respondent Planned Parenthood Center for Choice Respondent Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Surgical Health Services Respondent Planned Parenthood South Texas Surgical Center Respondent Bhavik Kumar, in case 21-50708 [21-50708] (RSM) [Entered: 08/09/2021 10:17 AM] |
| COURT DIRECTIVE ISSUED requesting a response to the Petition for writ of mandamus filed by Petitioners Ms. Penny Clarkston and Mr. Mark Lee Dickson in 21-50708 [ # 9637533-2 ] Response/Opposition due on 08/10/2021 by 5pm central time.. [21-50708] (RAJ) [Entered: 08/07/2021 02:16 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [21-50708] (Richard Muniz ) [Entered: 08/07/2021 03:52 PM] |
| COURT ORDER granting Motion to stay district court proceedings filed by Petitioners Ms. Penny Clarkston and Mr. Mark Lee Dickson [ # 9637534-2 ]; granting the alternative motion for a temporary administrative stay pending consideration filed by Petitioners Ms. Penny Clarkston and Mr. Mark Lee Dickson [ # 9637534-3 ]; deferring action on Petition for writ of mandamus filed by Petitioners Ms. Penny Clarkston and Mr. Mark Lee Dickson [ # 9637533-2 ] [21-50708] (RAJ) [Entered: 08/07/2021 02:02 PM] |
| LETTER filed by Petitioner Ms. Penny Clarkston referencing Letter filed by Respondents Alamo City Surgery Center, P.L.L.C., Brookside Women's Medical Center, P.A., Ms. Erika Forbes, Ms. Allison Gilbert, Houston Women's Reproductive Services, Mr. Daniel Kanter, Ms. Marva Sadler, Southwestern Women's Surgery Center, Whole Woman's Health and Whole Woman's Health Alliance [ # 9637540-2 ], Memo Supporting Document filed by Petitioners Ms. Penny Clarkston and Mr. Mark Lee Dickson [ # 9637535-2 ]. Date of Service: 08/07/2021 via email - Attorney for Respondents: Duane, Lawrence, Murray, Segura, Sharma; Attorney for Petitioners: Hacker, Mitchell [21-50708] (Heather Gebelin Hacker ) [Entered: 08/07/2021 01:57 PM] |
| PETITION filed by Petitioners Ms. Penny Clarkston and Mr. Mark Lee Dickson for writ of mandamus [9637533-2] Ruling is requested by: 08/07/2021 Date received in 5th Circuit: 08/07/2021..[21-50708] (RAJ) [Entered: 08/07/2021 07:32 AM] |
| OPPOSED MOTION filed by Petitioners Ms. Penny Clarkston and Mr. Mark Lee Dickson to stay district court proceedings [9637534-2] Ruling is requested by: 08/07/2021, alternatively, for a temporary administrative stay pending consideration of this motion and motion to expedite [9637534-3]. Response/Opposition due on 08/17/2021. [21-50708] (RAJ) [Entered: 08/07/2021 07:53 AM] |
| EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT of Petition for writ of mandamus [ # 9637533-2 ], Motion to stay district court proceedings [ # 9637534-2 ], Alternative motion for temporary administrative stay pending consideration [ # 9637534-3 ] filed by Petitioners Ms. Penny Clarkston and Mr. Mark Lee Dickson Date of Service: 08/07/2021 [21-50708] (RAJ) [Entered: 08/07/2021 07:56 AM] |
| LETTER filed by Respondents Alamo City Surgery Center, P.L.L.C., Brookside Women's Medical Center, P.A., Ms. Erika Forbes, Ms. Allison Gilbert, Houston Women's Reproductive Services, Mr. Daniel Kanter, Ms. Marva Sadler, Southwestern Women's Surgery Center, Whole Woman's Health and Whole Woman's Health Alliance referencing Petition for writ of mandamus filed by Petitioners Ms. Penny Clarkston and Mr. Mark Lee Dickson in 21-50708 [ # 9637533-2 ], Motion to stay district court proceedings filed by Petitioners Ms. Penny Clarkston and Mr. Mark Lee Dickson in 21-50708 [ # 9637534-2 ], alteratively for a temporary administrative stay pending consideration filed by Petitioners Ms. Penny Clarkston and Mr. Mark Lee Dickson in 21-50708 [ # 9637534-3 ]. [21-50708] (RAJ) [Entered: 08/07/2021 11:41 AM] |
| ORIGINAL PROCEEDING CASE docketed. [21-50708] (RAJ) [Entered: 08/07/2021 07:19 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
