Hudnall v. Smith
| Robert K. Hudnall and Sharon Elias Hudnall |
| Ty Smith, Individually and as agent for Smith and Ramirez Restoration LLC, Alejandro C. Ramirez, Individually and agent for Smith and Ramirez Restoration L.L.C., Kurt G. Paxson, Individually and agent for Mounce, Green, Myers, Safi, Paxson and Galatzan, Garrett J. Yancey, Individually and as agent for Mounce, Green, Myers, Safi, Paxson and Galatzan, James A. Martinez, Individually and as agent for Mounce, Green, Myers, Safi, Paxson and Galatzan, Smith and Ramirez Restoration, L.L.C., Evanston Insurance Company, Insurance Company for Smith and Ramirez Restoration L.L.C., Guy Bluff, John Does 1-100, Mounce, Green, Myers, Safi, Paxson and Galatzan, Catherine Hanna, Individually and Agent for Hanna and Plaut L.L.P., Hanna and Plaut, L.L.P. and Liberty Lloyds of Texas Insurance Company |
| 21-50783 |
| August 24, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| FEE PAID by Appellants Mr. Robert K. Hudnall and Ms. Sharon Elias Hudnall. Fee deadline satisfied [21-50783] (MVM) [Entered: 09/29/2021 12:14 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Angela Morrow Nickey for party(s) Appellee Garrett J. Yancey Appellee Kurt G. Paxson Appellee James A. Martinez Appellee Mounce, Green, Myers, Safi, Paxson and Galatzan, in case 21-50783 [21-50783] (MFY) [Entered: 09/23/2021 02:34 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-50783] (Angela Morrow Nickey ) [Entered: 09/22/2021 12:15 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Stephen Andrew Melendi for Appellee Evanston Insurance Company in 21-50783 [21-50783] (MVM) [Entered: 09/22/2021 12:24 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Frank M. Kennedy for party(s) Appellee Evanston Insurance Company, in case 21-50783 [21-50783] (MVM) [Entered: 09/22/2021 12:25 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [21-50783] (Frank M. Kennedy ) [Entered: 09/21/2021 03:30 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Stephen Andrew Melendi for Evanston Insurance Company for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-50783] (Stephen Andrew Melendi ) [Entered: 09/21/2021 03:00 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Raymond D. Martinez for party(s) Appellee Guy Bluff, in case 21-50783 [21-50783] (MVM) [Entered: 09/17/2021 02:52 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-50783] (Raymond D. Martinez ) [Entered: 09/16/2021 12:30 PM] |
| Attorney Mr. Jonathan Lionel Ray Baeza for Appellee Mr. Guy Bluff Attorney Raymond D. Martinez is advised to resubmit an appearance form. Reason: The submitted appearance form does not match the registered attorney. [21-50783] (BF) [Entered: 09/16/2021 12:18 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Oscar Arnulfo Lara for party(s) Appellee Alejandro C. Ramirez Appellee Ty Smith Appellee Smith and Ramirez Restoration, L.L.C., in case 21-50783 [21-50783] (MVM) [Entered: 09/16/2021 12:52 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [21-50783] (Oscar Arnulfo Lara ) [Entered: 09/15/2021 04:02 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [21-50783] (Jonathan Lionel Ray Baeza ) [Entered: 09/15/2021 06:19 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9659300-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 09/23/2021 for Appellants Robert K. Hudnall and Sharon Elias Hudnall [21-50783] (MVM) [Entered: 09/08/2021 02:43 PM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellants Mr. Robert K. Hudnall and Ms. Sharon Elias Hudnall [21-50783] (MVM) [Entered: 08/24/2021 02:52 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
