Ellis-Erkkila v. USA
| Priscilla Ann Ellis-Erkkila |
| United States of America, Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden Michael Carr, FMC Carswell, Magistrate Jeffrey C. Manske, Western District of Texas, Waco Division, United States Marshalls Service, Western District of Texas, Waco, Texas and John Does, FBI Agents from the MD of Florida |
| 21-50828 |
| September 13, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| DISTRICT COURT AMENDED ORDER of 10/29/2021 including filing fee assessment as to prior Baugh order. Fee due or motion for IFP in 5CCA deadline updated to 12/03/2021 for Appellant Priscilla Ann Ellis-Erkkila [21-50828] (MFY) [Entered: 11/03/2021 10:53 AM] |
| UPDATED CASE PROCESSING NOTICE sent. [21-50828] (MFY) [Entered: 11/03/2021 10:53 AM] |
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 10/13/2021 denying IFP for Appellant Ms. Priscilla Ann Ellis-Erkkila because appeal is not taken in good faith - fee assessment required - BAUGH case. [21-50828] (MFY) [Entered: 10/26/2021 09:47 AM] |
| DISTRICT COURT NOTICE - IFP pending for Appellant Ms. Priscilla Ann Ellis-Erkkila. Fee deadline satisfied. [21-50828] (CNF) [Entered: 10/13/2021 10:58 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9673994-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 11/22/2021 for Appellant Priscilla Ann Ellis-Erkkila [21-50828] (CNF) [Entered: 09/27/2021 08:09 AM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Priscilla Ann Ellis-Erkkila [21-50828] (MVM) [Entered: 09/13/2021 10:07 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
