McMurry v. Brunner
| Megan Marie McMurry, Individually and as next friend of J.M. and Adam Seth McMurry, Individually and as next friend of J.M. |
| Kevin Brunner |
| 21-50888 |
| September 22, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| COURT ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the joint motion to view and obtain sealed documents is GRANTED. [ # 9700916-2 ] [21-50888] (CAS) [Entered: 11/01/2021 08:10 AM] |
| UNOPPOSED(JOINT) MOTION filed by Appellees Mr. Adam Seth McMurry and Ms. Megan Marie McMurry to view and obtain sealed document. Date of service: 10/29/2021 [21-50888] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Kevin Brunner to view and obtain sealed document. Date of service: 10/29/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Bagley; Attorney for Appellants: Brandt, Henninger [21-50888] (Stephen Douglas Henninger ) [Entered: 10/29/2021 11:59 AM] |
| EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellant Mr. Kevin Brunner. Extension Granted to and including 12/15/2021. A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 12/15/2021 for Appellant Kevin Brunner [21-50888] (CAS) [Entered: 10/12/2021 11:36 AM] |
| UNOPPOSED LEVEL 1 EXTENSION REQUESTED by Appellant Mr. Kevin Brunner for filing Appellant's Brief until 12/15/2021 [21-50888] (Stephen Douglas Henninger ) [Entered: 10/11/2021 02:51 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-50888] (MRW) [Entered: 10/04/2021 11:07 AM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 11/15/2021 for Appellant Kevin Brunner. [21-50888] (MRW) [Entered: 10/04/2021 11:08 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Peter F. Bagley for Appellee Adam Seth McMurry in 21-50888, Attorney Peter F. Bagley for Appellee Megan Marie McMurry in 21-50888 [21-50888] (RSM) [Entered: 10/01/2021 01:28 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Peter F. Bagley for Mr. Adam Seth McMurry and Ms. Megan Marie McMurry for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-50888] (Peter F. Bagley ) [Entered: 09/30/2021 02:34 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Stephen Douglas Henninger for Appellant Kevin Brunner in 21-50888 [21-50888] (CAS) [Entered: 09/30/2021 11:10 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Thomas Phillip Brandt for party(s) Appellant Kevin Brunner, in case 21-50888 [21-50888] (CAS) [Entered: 09/30/2021 11:07 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Stephen Douglas Henninger for Mr. Kevin Brunner for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [21-50888] (Stephen Douglas Henninger ) [Entered: 09/28/2021 10:49 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-50888] (Thomas Phillip Brandt ) [Entered: 09/28/2021 10:47 AM] |
| ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Appellant Mr. Kevin Brunnerfor the Court to process. Date of service: 09/28/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Bagley; Attorney for Appellant: Henninger. [21-50888] (Stephen Douglas Henninger ) [Entered: 09/28/2021 10:52 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 7:20-CV-242. Electronic ROA due on 10/13/2021. [21-50888] (CAS) [Entered: 09/28/2021 01:42 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9676004-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [21-50888] (CAS) [Entered: 09/28/2021 01:39 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received advising transcript unnecessary. [21-50888] (CAS) [Entered: 09/28/2021 01:44 PM] |
| CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Kevin Brunner [21-50888] (CBW) [Entered: 09/22/2021 03:11 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
