Ballentine v. Broxton
| Garland Ballentine |
| Sergeant Heather Broxton, Jay Hart, SIGMO and Vicki Cundiff, Grievance Department |
| 21-51043 |
| November 1, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Erika Danielle Hime for Appellee Vicki Cundiff in 21-51043, Attorney Erika Danielle Hime for Appellee Jay Hart in 21-51043, Attorney Erika Danielle Hime for Appellee Heather Broxton in 21-51043 [21-51043] (MVM) [Entered: 12/07/2021 08:27 AM] |
| FORWARDING MOTION for IFP received from Appellant Mr. Garland Ballentine to the District Court for filing.Fee deadline canceled. [21-51043] (CNF) [Entered: 12/06/2021 12:03 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Erika Danielle Hime for Ms. Heather Broxton, Ms. Vicki Cundiff and Mr. Jay Hart for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-51043] (Erika Danielle Hime ) [Entered: 12/03/2021 01:01 PM] |
| LETTER OF ADVISEMENT. Reason: to advise appellant because he filed another notice of appeal, a docketing fee is required. [21-51043] (CNF) [Entered: 11/23/2021 08:18 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Review after Fee Issue is Resolved (PLRA case). [9709567-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 01/04/2022 for Appellant Garland Ballentine [21-51043] (MVM) [Entered: 11/10/2021 01:38 PM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Garland Ballentine [21-51043] (RSM) [Entered: 11/01/2021 08:56 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
