Colina v. Gillis
Jaime Ramon Alvarez Colina |
Shawn R. Gillis, Warden of Adams County Correctional Center |
21-60064 |
January 29, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
LETTER filed by Appellant Mr. Jaime Ramon Alvarez Colina - advising that no reply brief will be filed. [21-60064] (SEP) [Entered: 03/08/2021 10:24 AM] |
APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED. # of Copies Provided: 1. A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied. Appellee's Brief due on 04/05/2021 for Appellee Shawn R. Gillis. [21-60064] (SEP) [Entered: 03/08/2021 10:22 AM] |
Paper copies of Appellant Brief received. Paper copies match electronic version of document? Yes # of Copies Provided: 4. [21-60064] (DMS) [Entered: 03/12/2021 11:58 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-60064] (Catherine Reno ) [Entered: 03/01/2021 11:30 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Robert Gregg Mayer for Appellee Shawn R. Gillis in 21-60064. [21-60064] (SEP) [Entered: 03/02/2021 02:44 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Catherine Reno for party(s) Appellee Shawn R. Gillis, in case 21-60064. [21-60064] (SEP) [Entered: 03/02/2021 02:48 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Robert Gregg Mayer, Esq. for Mr. Shawn R. Gillis for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-60064] (Robert Gregg Mayer ) [Entered: 03/01/2021 09:53 AM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No State Court Papers included? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-60064] (CMB) [Entered: 02/26/2021 04:09 PM] |
DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 02/24/2021 granting IFP for Appellant Mr. Jaime Ramon Alvarez Colina. [21-60064] (SEP) [Entered: 02/25/2021 09:59 AM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 5:20-CV-12. Electronic ROA due on 03/12/2021. [21-60064] (SEP) [Entered: 02/25/2021 10:00 AM] |
BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. A/Pet's Brief due on 04/06/2021 for Appellant Jaime Ramon Alvarez Colina. [21-60064] (SEP) [Entered: 02/25/2021 10:01 AM] |
DISTRICT COURT NOTICE - IFP pending for Appellant Mr. Jaime Ramon Alvarez Colina. [21-60064] (SEP) [Entered: 02/24/2021 08:51 AM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9498950-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. (IFP pending in DC). [21-60064] (SEP) [Entered: 02/08/2021 08:18 AM] |
PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Jaime Ramon Alvarez Colina. [21-60064] (DLJ) [Entered: 01/29/2021 04:33 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Colina v. Gillis | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: Jaime Ramon Alvarez Colina | |
Represented By: | Jaime Ramon Alvarez Colina |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: Shawn R. Gillis, Warden of Adams County Correctional Center | |
Represented By: | Robert Gregg Mayer Esq. |
Represented By: | Catherine Reno |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.