Goodwin v. Saul
Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security |
Kathryn Goodwin |
21-60225 |
March 18, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Joseph Luke Benedict for Appellee Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security in 21-60225 [21-60225] (CB) [Entered: 04/13/2021 03:32 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Joseph Luke Benedict for Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-60225] (Joseph Luke Benedict ) [Entered: 04/12/2021 03:52 PM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-60225] (DDL) [Entered: 04/09/2021 11:34 AM] |
BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 05/19/2021 for Appellant Kathryn Goodwin. [21-60225] (DDL) [Entered: 04/09/2021 11:35 AM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 1:20-CV-38. Electronic ROA due on 04/22/2021. [21-60225] (CB) [Entered: 04/07/2021 09:24 AM] |
TRANSCRIPT FILED IN DISTRICT COURT Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Phyllis K. McLarty, Dt. Filed in Dist. Ct: 04/07/2021 Transcript Due/Court Reporter Discount Date canceled [21-60225] (CB) [Entered: 04/07/2021 09:21 AM] |
NOTICE RECEIVED that the transcript ordered by Appellant Ms. Kathryn Goodwin is complete and has been filed in the District Court. [21-60225] (Phyllis K. McLarty ) [Entered: 04/07/2021 08:40 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Leanna Reynolds for Appellant Kathryn Goodwin in 21-60225 [21-60225] (MCS) [Entered: 03/26/2021 03:52 PM] |
ACKNOWLEDGMENT received from Court Reporter Phyllis K. McLarty Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Phyllis K. McLarty, Est. Completion Dt: 04/15/2021, Est. No.of Pgs: 35, Dt. Fin Arrangements Made: 03/18/2021, Dt. Trans. to be Filed: 04/19/2021, Proceeding Type and Date: Oral Argument/Hearing 02/12/2021. Transcript Order ddl satisfied. Transcript Due/Court Reporter Discount Date is 04/19/2021 for Phyllis McLarty, Court Reporter [21-60225] (MAS) [Entered: 03/25/2021 09:49 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-60225] (Leanna Reynolds ) [Entered: 03/25/2021 11:07 AM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9534307-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 04/08/2021 for Appellant Kathryn Goodwin [21-60225] (CB) [Entered: 03/24/2021 03:31 PM] |
COURT REPORTER ACKNOWLEDGMENT received from Phyllis K. McLarty. [21-60225] (Phyllis K. McLarty ) [Entered: 03/24/2021 08:26 PM] |
SOCIAL SECURITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Kathryn Goodwin [21-60225] (MCS) [Entered: 03/18/2021 02:03 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Goodwin v. Saul | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security | |
Represented By: | Joseph Luke Benedict |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: Kathryn Goodwin | |
Represented By: | Leanna Reynolds |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.