USA v. Hardy
Defendant / Appellant: Curtis J. Hardy, also known as Curtis Jerome Hardy
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Case Number: 21-60280
Filed: April 2, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 9, 2022 USA v. Hardy

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 13, 2021 MOTION to withdraw as counsel [9549552-2] Response/Opposition due on 04/26/2021.. [21-60280] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: MOTION to withdraw as counsel [9549552-2] Response/Opposition due on 04/26/2021. [21-60280] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: MOTION filed by Attorney Ms. Princess Abby for Appellant Mr. Curtis J. Hardy to withdraw as counsel [9549552-2]. Date of Service: 04/13/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Abby, Scott; Attorney for Appellees: Kennedy, McCalla [21-60280] (Princess Abby ) [Entered: 04/13/2021 02:01 PM]
April 12, 2021 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-60280] (DLJ) [Entered: 04/12/2021 04:00 PM]
April 12, 2021 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. A/Pet's Brief Due on 05/24/2021, for Appellant Curtis J. Hardy. [21-60280] (DLJ) [Entered: 04/12/2021 04:06 PM]
April 7, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Meghan McCalla for Appellee USA in 21-60280 [21-60280] (CB) [Entered: 04/07/2021 03:25 PM]
April 7, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Meghan McCalla for USA for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [21-60280] (Meghan McCalla ) [Entered: 04/07/2021 11:11 AM]
April 7, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Gregory Layne Kennedy for Appellee USA in 21-60280 [21-60280] (CB) [Entered: 04/07/2021 09:26 AM]
April 6, 2021 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9543372-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [21-60280] (DLJ) [Entered: 04/06/2021 10:30 AM]
April 6, 2021 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:03-CR-68-1. Electronic ROA due on 04/21/2021. [21-60280] (DLJ) [Entered: 04/06/2021 10:40 AM]
April 6, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Gregory Layne Kennedy, Esq. for USA for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-60280] (Gregory Layne Kennedy ) [Entered: 04/06/2021 10:47 AM]
April 2, 2021 NON-DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Curtis J. Hardy. [21-60280] (DLJ) [Entered: 04/02/2021 11:55 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Hardy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: Curtis J. Hardy, also known as Curtis Jerome Hardy
Represented By: Princess Abby
Represented By: Michael L. Scott Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: United States of America
Represented By: Meghan McCalla
Represented By: Gregory Layne Kennedy Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?