Lopez-Claros v. Garland
| Jairon Esau Leiva-Lopez, Nolvia Lopez-Claros, Idalia Sarahi Leiva-Lopez and Cristian Fabricio Leiva-Lopez |
| Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General |
| 21-60289 |
| April 6, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Brendan Paul Hogan for party(s) Respondent Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, in case 21-60289 [21-60289] (CB) [Entered: 04/07/2021 03:28 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Jesus A. Macias for Petitioner Idalia Sarahi Leiva-Lopez in 21-60289, Attorney Jesus A. Macias for Petitioner Cristian Fabricio Leiva-Lopez in 21-60289, Attorney Jesus A. Macias for Petitioner Jairon Esau Leiva-Lopez in 21-60289, Attorney Jesus A. Macias for Petitioner Nolvia Lopez-Claros in 21-60289 [21-60289] (CB) [Entered: 04/07/2021 02:24 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9544599-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [21-60289] (CB) [Entered: 04/07/2021 10:35 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-60289] (Brendan Paul Hogan ) [Entered: 04/07/2021 09:51 AM] |
| IMMIGRATION CASE docketed. Petition for review filed by Petitioners Mr. Cristian Fabricio Leiva-Lopez, Ms. Idalia Sarahi Leiva-Lopez, Mr. Jairon Esau Leiva-Lopez and Ms. Nolvia Lopez-Claros. Date received in 5th Circuit: 04/06/2021. Immigration File Number: a208 780 789,a208 780 790,a208 780 791,a208 780 792 Administrative Record due on 05/17/2021 [21-60289] (CB) [Entered: 04/06/2021 04:25 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
