McCray v. Saul
| Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security |
| Emma McCray |
| 21-60401 |
| May 7, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| TRANSCRIPT FILED IN DISTRICT COURT Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Phyllis K. McLarty, Dt. Filed in Dist. Ct: 06/10/2021 Transcript Due/Court Reporter Discount Date canceled [21-60401] (WMJ) [Entered: 06/10/2021 04:35 PM] |
| NOTICE RECEIVED that the transcript ordered by Appellant Ms. Emma McCray is complete and has been filed in the District Court. [21-60401] (Phyllis K. McLarty ) [Entered: 06/10/2021 04:22 PM] |
| ACKNOWLEDGMENT Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Phyllis K. McLarty, Est. Completion Dt: 06/07/2021, Est. No.of Pgs: 30, Dt. Fin Arrangements Made: 05/07/2021, Dt. Trans. to be Filed: 06/07/2021, Proceeding Type and Date: Hearing 10/15/2020. Transcript Due/Court Reporter Discount Date is 06/07/2021 for Phyllis K. McLarty, Court Reporter [21-60401] (CB) [Entered: 05/13/2021 08:06 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Leanna Reynolds for Appellant Emma McCray in 21-60401 [21-60401] (WMJ) [Entered: 05/13/2021 04:35 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Ms. Emma McCray. DETAILS: Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Phyllis K. McLarty, Proceeding Type and Date: Hearing 10/15/2020. Transcript Order ddl satisfied. Electronic Filing Processed: [ # 9573085-2 ] [21-60401] (CB) [Entered: 05/13/2021 08:03 AM] |
| ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Appellant Ms. Emma McCrayfor the Court to process. Date of service: 05/13/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Reynolds; Attorney for Appellee: Wright. [21-60401] (Leanna Reynolds ) [Entered: 05/13/2021 07:53 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process for main & additional notices of appeal docketed 05/07/2021 [9572157-2]. Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Transcript order due on 05/27/2021, for Appellant Emma McCray. [21-60401] (DLJ) [Entered: 05/12/2021 09:53 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Leanna Reynolds for Ms. Emma McCray for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-60401] (Leanna Reynolds ) [Entered: 05/12/2021 02:30 PM] |
| COURT REPORTER ACKNOWLEDGMENT received from Phyllis K. McLarty. [21-60401] (Phyllis K. McLarty ) [Entered: 05/12/2021 07:38 PM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [9569581-2] NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Emma McCray. [9569581-1] [21-60401] (DLJ) [Entered: 05/07/2021 02:48 PM] |
| US CIVIL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Emma McCray. [21-60401] (DLJ) [Entered: 05/07/2021 02:34 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: McCray v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Samuel David Wright |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Emma McCray | |
| Represented By: | Leanna Reynolds |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
