Harris v. Clay County, MS
Defendant / Appellant: Eddie Scott, Sheriff, in his Individual and Official Capacities, Laddie Huffman, Former Sheriff, in his Individual and Official Capacities and Clay County, Mississippi
Plaintiff / Appellee: Rachel Harris, Guardian of Steven Jessie Harris, on behalf of Steven Jessie Harris
Case Number: 21-60456
Filed: May 26, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 11, 2022 Summary Harris v. Clay County, MS
August 24, 2022 Summary Harris v. Clay County, MS

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 28, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Carlos Eugene Moore for Appellee Rachel Harris in 21-60456 [21-60456] (MAS) [Entered: 06/28/2021 04:57 PM]
June 24, 2021 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 08/03/2021 for Appellants Clay County, Mississippi, Laddie Huffman and Eddie Scott. [21-60456] (DDL) [Entered: 06/24/2021 09:53 AM]
June 24, 2021 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-60456] (DDL) [Entered: 06/24/2021 09:51 AM]
June 22, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-60456] (Carlos Eugene Moore ) [Entered: 06/22/2021 12:12 PM]
June 22, 2021 ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Appellants Clay County, Mississippi, Mr. Laddie Huffman and Mr. Eddie Scottfor the Court to process. Date of service: 06/22/2021 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Doran, Moore; Attorney for Appellants: Kerby, Savrin. [21-60456] (Philip W. Savrin ) [Entered: 06/22/2021 01:44 PM]
June 22, 2021 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. [21-60456] (CB) [Entered: 06/22/2021 03:15 PM]
June 22, 2021 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9601925-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [21-60456] (SEP) [Entered: 06/22/2021 08:44 AM]
June 16, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Philip W. Savrin for Appellant Clay County, Mississippi in 21-60456, Attorney Philip W. Savrin for Appellant Eddie Scott in 21-60456, Attorney Philip W. Savrin for Appellant Laddie Huffman in 21-60456 [21-60456] (MAS) [Entered: 06/16/2021 08:22 AM]
June 14, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Philip W. Savrin for Clay County, Mississippi, Mr. Laddie Huffman and Mr. Eddie Scott for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-60456] (Philip W. Savrin ) [Entered: 06/14/2021 02:41 PM]
June 14, 2021 CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed in district court on June 11, 2021. [9595500-2] Parties added: Appellant Clay County, Mississippi. NOA filed by Appellants Clay County, Mississippi, Mr. Laddie Huffman and Mr. Eddie Scott. [9595500-1] [21-60456] (SEP) [Entered: 06/14/2021 09:43 AM]
June 10, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Philip W. Savrin for party(s) Appellant Eddie Scott Appellant Laddie Huffman, in case 21-60456 [21-60456] (MAS) [Entered: 06/10/2021 01:25 PM]
June 9, 2021 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [21-60456] (Philip W. Savrin ) [Entered: 06/09/2021 01:09 PM]
June 8, 2021 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9591889-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [21-60456] (DLJ) [Entered: 06/08/2021 02:44 PM]
June 8, 2021 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 1:18-CV-167. Electronic ROA due on 06/23/2021. [21-60456] (DLJ) [Entered: 06/08/2021 02:54 PM]
May 26, 2021 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellants Mr. Laddie Huffman and Mr. Eddie Scott [21-60456] (WMJ) [Entered: 05/26/2021 04:18 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Harris v. Clay County, MS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: Eddie Scott, Sheriff, in his Individual and Official Capacities
Represented By: Katherine Searcy Kerby Esq.
Represented By: Philip W. Savrin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: Laddie Huffman, Former Sheriff, in his Individual and Official Capacities
Represented By: Katherine Searcy Kerby Esq.
Represented By: Philip W. Savrin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: Clay County, Mississippi
Represented By: Philip W. Savrin
Represented By: Katherine Searcy Kerby Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: Rachel Harris, Guardian of Steven Jessie Harris, on behalf of Steven Jessie Harris
Represented By: Carlos Eugene Moore Esq.
Represented By: Pride Justin Doran Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?