Sheikh Osman v. Garland
Petitioner: Ahmed Mohammed Sheikh Osman
Respondent: Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Case Number: 21-60508
Filed: June 17, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
August 25, 2022 Sheikh Osman v. Garland

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 17, 2021 IMMIGRATION CASE docketed. Petition for review filed by Petitioner Mr. Ahmed Mohammed Sheikh Osman. Date received in 5th Circuit: 06/17/2021. Immigration File Number: a071 686 840 Administrative Record due on 07/27/2021 [21-60508] (CB) [Entered: 06/17/2021 03:35 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Sheikh Osman v. Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ahmed Mohammed Sheikh Osman
Represented By: Luke Habeeb Abrusley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Represented By: Office of Immigration Litigation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?