Corona Gonzalez v. Garland
| Aida Corona Gonzalez, Kenneth Gomez Corona, Alan Gustavo Gomez Corona and Fernanda Isabel Gomez Corona |
| Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General |
| 21-60646 |
| August 18, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION for stay of removal [9647026-2]. Response/Opposition due on 08/30/2021. [21-60646] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: MOTION filed by Petitioners Ms. Aida Corona Gonzalez, Mr. Alan Gustavo Gomez Corona, Ms. Fernanda Isabel Gomez Corona and Mr. Kenneth Gomez Corona for stay of removal [9647026-2]. Date of service: 08/19/2021 via email - Attorney for Petitioner: Foxworth; Attorney for Respondent: OIL [21-60646] (John Alex Foxworth Jr.) [Entered: 08/19/2021 10:15 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Matthew Allan Spurlock for party(s) Respondent Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, in case 21-60646 [21-60646] (CB) [Entered: 08/19/2021 11:22 AM] |
| IMMIGRATION CASE docketed. Petition for review filed by Petitioners Ms. Aida Corona Gonzalez, Mr. Alan Gustavo Gomez Corona, Ms. Fernanda Isabel Gomez Corona and Mr. Kenneth Gomez Corona. Date received in 5th Circuit: 08/18/2021. Immigration File Number: a208 307 319,a208 307 320,a208 307 321,a208 307 322 Administrative Record due on 09/27/2021 [21-60646] (CB) [Entered: 08/18/2021 03:28 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-60646] (Matthew Allan Spurlock ) [Entered: 08/18/2021 03:58 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
