Montoya-Medina v. Garland
| Ruben Emigdio Montoya-Medina |
| Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General |
| 21-60648 |
| August 18, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Norberto Cardenas III for Petitioner Ruben Emigdio Montoya-Medina in 21-60648 [21-60648] (CB) [Entered: 08/19/2021 04:23 PM] |
| IMMIGRATION CASE docketed. Petition for review filed by Petitioner Mr. Ruben Emigdio Montoya-Medina. Date received in 5th Circuit: 08/18/2021. Immigration File Number: a213 073 026 Administrative Record due on 09/27/2021 [21-60648] (CB) [Entered: 08/18/2021 04:08 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Montoya-Medina v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Ruben Emigdio Montoya-Medina | |
| Represented By: | Norberto Cardenas III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General | |
| Represented By: | Office of Immigration Litigation |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
