Cole v. Lumpkin
| Jaime Piero Cole |
| Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
| 21-70011 |
| December 17, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| COURT ORDER granting Motion to extend time to comply with COA requirements filed by Appellant Mr. Jaime Piero Cole [ # 9759480-2 ] Motion due deadline updated to 03/02/2022 for Appellant Jaime Piero Cole. Brief in Support deadline updated to 03/02/2022 for Appellant Jaime Piero Cole [21-70011] (MRW) [Entered: 01/25/2022 01:04 PM] |
| UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Jaime Piero Cole to extend time to comply with COA requirements until 03/02/2022 [9759480-2]. Date of service: 01/20/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Hanna, Marshall; Attorney for Appellants: Nolan, Walker [21-70011] (Peter James Walker ) [Entered: 01/20/2022 01:48 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Peter James Walker for party(s) Appellant Jaime Piero Cole, in case 21-70011 [21-70011] (MFY) [Entered: 12/30/2021 03:29 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-70011] (Peter James Walker ) [Entered: 12/29/2021 01:45 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Cara Hanna for party(s) Appellee Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, in case 21-70011 [21-70011] (MRW) [Entered: 12/22/2021 07:32 AM] |
| LETTER ISSUED. Motion for COA and brief in support are required. Motion due on 01/31/2022 for Appellant Jaime Piero Cole. Brief in Support due on 01/31/2022 for Appellant Jaime Piero Cole [21-70011] (MRW) [Entered: 12/21/2021 12:37 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No State Court Papers included? Yes. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [21-70011] (MRW) [Entered: 12/21/2021 11:30 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [21-70011] (Cara Hanna ) [Entered: 12/20/2021 11:51 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9737462-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [21-70011] (MRW) [Entered: 12/17/2021 03:40 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:17-CV-940. Electronic ROA due on 01/03/2022. [21-70011] (MRW) [Entered: 12/17/2021 03:43 PM] |
| DEATH PENALTY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Jaime Piero Cole [21-70011] (MRW) [Entered: 12/17/2021 01:46 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Cole v. Lumpkin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: Jaime Piero Cole | |
| Represented By: | Shawn Nolan |
| Represented By: | Peter James Walker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division | |
| Represented By: | Cara Hanna |
| Represented By: | Edward Larry Marshall |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
