Smith v. Summit Midstream Prts
| Willie Ray Smith |
| Summit Midstream Partners, L.L.C. |
| 22-10020 |
| January 10, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Jobs (Civil Rights) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied. Record Excerpts due on 03/18/2022 for Appellant Willie Ray Smith. Appellee's Brief due on 04/01/2022 for Appellee Summit Midstream Partners, L.L.C. [22-10020] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Mr. Willie Ray Smith. Date of service: 03/02/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Lambert; Attorney for Appellant: Polk; fax - Attorney for Appellee: Lambert [22-10020] (James Earl Polk II) [Entered: 03/02/2022 07:02 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney James Earl Polk II for Appellant Willie Ray Smith in 22-10020 [22-10020] (RSM) [Entered: 01/21/2022 03:13 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-10020] (MRW) [Entered: 01/21/2022 04:19 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 03/02/2022 for Appellant Willie Ray Smith. [22-10020] (MRW) [Entered: 01/21/2022 04:22 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Arthur V. Lambert for Appellee Summit Midstream Partners, L.L.C. in 22-10020 [22-10020] (RSM) [Entered: 01/21/2022 10:11 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:19-CV-1841. Electronic ROA due on 02/07/2022. [22-10020] (MFY) [Entered: 01/21/2022 09:01 AM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Willie Ray Smith advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Date of Service: 01/20/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Lambert; Attorney for Appellant: Polk [22-10020] (James Earl Polk II) [Entered: 01/20/2022 03:04 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-10020] (James Earl Polk II) [Entered: 01/20/2022 02:56 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Arthur V. Lambert for Summit Midstream Partners, L.L.C. for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-10020] (Arthur V. Lambert ) [Entered: 01/19/2022 02:32 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9754426-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 01/27/2022 for Appellant Willie Ray Smith [22-10020] (RSM) [Entered: 01/12/2022 06:03 PM] |
| CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Willie Ray Smith [22-10020] (MVM) [Entered: 01/10/2022 03:34 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Smith v. Summit Midstream Prts | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Willie Ray Smith | |
| Represented By: | James Earl Polk II |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: Summit Midstream Partners, L.L.C. | |
| Represented By: | Arthur V. Lambert |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
